Use of smart glasses for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in adults: a randomized clinical trial

Background Head-mounted displays can be integrated with ultrasonography to overlay the image in the operator's field of view, improving hand-eye coordination during invasive procedures. The clinical efficacy of smart glasses for central venous catheterization (CVC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether using smart glasses can improve efficiency compared to conventional ultrasound-guided CVC. Methods This prospective, single-blinded, controlled study enrolled adult patients who underwent elective surgery requiring CVC. Patients were assigned to either the ultrasound screen (control) or smart glasses group using stratified randomization according to operator qualification. The primary outcome was the overall CVC procedural time. Secondary outcomes included ultrasound scanning and venous access time, number of needle redirections and probe repositionings, procedural success and complication rates. Results In total, 124 patients were analyzed. The overall procedural time was significantly reduced in the smart glasses group compared to that in the control group (158 [140, 189] s vs. 134 [117,150] s; median difference, 26.0 s; 95% CI, [16.0–37.0] s, P < 0.001). Specifically, the ultrasound scanning time (median difference, 3.0 s, P = 0.004), venous access time (median difference, 2.0 s, P = 0.013), number of needle redirections (median difference, 1.0, P = 0.003) and probe repositionings (median difference, 0.0, P = 0.005) were significantly reduced in the smart glasses group compared to those in the control group. However, the success and complication rates were comparable between groups. Conclusions Smart glasses modestly improved procedural efficiency in ultrasound-guided CVC, potientially for novices, without improving success or complication rates. Larger-sample studies with more diverse operators and patients are warranted. Trial registration Name of trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number: NCT06469034 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06469034?id=NCT06469034&rank=1

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112331
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of smart glasses for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in adults: a randomized clinical trial

Yuwen Wang, Yun Lin WU, Penglei WANG, Zongqin Zheng et al.
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Use of smart glasses for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization in adults: a randomized clinical trial

Yuwen Wang, Yun Lin WU, Penglei WANG, Zongqin Zheng, Lingling Jiang, Furui Wang, Tingting Xue, Ye Zhang, Ping Liu, Rui Zhang
article en

Abstract

Background Head-mounted displays can be integrated with ultrasonography to overlay the image in the operator's field of view, improving hand-eye coordination during invasive procedures. The clinical efficacy of smart glasses for central venous catheterization (CVC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether using smart glasses can improve efficiency compared to conventional ultrasound-guided CVC. Methods This prospective, single-blinded, controlled study enrolled adult patients who underwent elective surgery requiring CVC. Patients were assigned to either the ultrasound screen (control) or smart glasses group using stratified randomization according to operator qualification. The primary outcome was the overall CVC procedural time. Secondary outcomes included ultrasound scanning and venous access time, number of needle redirections and probe repositionings, procedural success and complication rates. Results In total, 124 patients were analyzed. The overall procedural time was significantly reduced in the smart glasses group compared to that in the control group (158 [140, 189] s vs. 134 [117,150] s; median difference, 26.0 s; 95% CI, [16.0–37.0] s, P < 0.001). Specifically, the ultrasound scanning time (median difference, 3.0 s, P = 0.004), venous access time (median difference, 2.0 s, P = 0.013), number of needle redirections (median difference, 1.0, P = 0.003) and probe repositionings (median difference, 0.0, P = 0.005) were significantly reduced in the smart glasses group compared to those in the control group. However, the success and complication rates were comparable between groups. Conclusions Smart glasses modestly improved procedural efficiency in ultrasound-guided CVC, potientially for novices, without improving success or complication rates. Larger-sample studies with more diverse operators and patients are warranted. Trial registration Name of trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number: NCT06469034 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06469034?id=NCT06469034&rank=1

Journal of Clinical AnesthesiaVol. 115
Anhui Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.