AI Fear as a Diagnostic of Institutional Alignment

Public discussion of advanced artificial intelligence contains a striking mixture of fears: loss of human control over autonomous systems, mass displacement of labor, concentration of economic power, manipulation, surveillance, competitive races among firms and states, and the possibility that actors will continue developing or deploying dangerous systems because stopping unilaterally would impose a disadvantage. This paper asks what those fears reveal not only about AI, but about the institutions into which AI is being introduced. It develops the concept of institutional alignment: the degree to which the behaviors selected and reproduced by an institution remain directed toward the broader human purposes by which that institution is judged. Capitalism is the principal case examined. The argument is not that capitalism is a conscious agent, nor that every market outcome is harmful. It is that competitive selection, profitability, ownership, labor dependence, externalities and accumulation can constrain the viable choices of individual participants and can reproduce aggregate outcomes that no participant needs to have chosen as a collective goal. The central hypothesis is that AI fear can function as a diagnostic of this condition. When a feared AI scenario remains frightening even after the AI is assumed to be obedient, the causal explanation must be sought partly in the institution directing and selecting its use. The paper therefore asks: We gave capitalism enough power. Now we are starting to fear it. Are we finally starting to know it? It closes by connecting this diagnosis to Marx's account of productive forces coming into conflict with existing relations of production. AI may be constrained from reaching its full human potential precisely because the uses selected under capitalism are those compatible with the system's reproduction. In that institutional alignment, and a productive force that makes the limits of the existing institutional arrangement increasingly visible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23127880
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

AI Fear as a Diagnostic of Institutional Alignment

Guilherme Cecatto
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
preprint

AI Fear as a Diagnostic of Institutional Alignment

Guilherme Cecatto
preprint en

Abstract

Public discussion of advanced artificial intelligence contains a striking mixture of fears: loss of human control over autonomous systems, mass displacement of labor, concentration of economic power, manipulation, surveillance, competitive races among firms and states, and the possibility that actors will continue developing or deploying dangerous systems because stopping unilaterally would impose a disadvantage. This paper asks what those fears reveal not only about AI, but about the institutions into which AI is being introduced. It develops the concept of institutional alignment: the degree to which the behaviors selected and reproduced by an institution remain directed toward the broader human purposes by which that institution is judged. Capitalism is the principal case examined. The argument is not that capitalism is a conscious agent, nor that every market outcome is harmful. It is that competitive selection, profitability, ownership, labor dependence, externalities and accumulation can constrain the viable choices of individual participants and can reproduce aggregate outcomes that no participant needs to have chosen as a collective goal. The central hypothesis is that AI fear can function as a diagnostic of this condition. When a feared AI scenario remains frightening even after the AI is assumed to be obedient, the causal explanation must be sought partly in the institution directing and selecting its use. The paper therefore asks: We gave capitalism enough power. Now we are starting to fear it. Are we finally starting to know it? It closes by connecting this diagnosis to Marx's account of productive forces coming into conflict with existing relations of production. AI may be constrained from reaching its full human potential precisely because the uses selected under capitalism are those compatible with the system's reproduction. In that institutional alignment, and a productive force that makes the limits of the existing institutional arrangement increasingly visible.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI Fear as a Diagnostic of Institutional Alignment — Guilherme Cecatto · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS