Perspectives on Credit Ratings: A Response to Reviews on “Rating Politics”

Abstract I would like to thank Matthias Thiemann and Yuri Biondi for organizing this symposium on Rating Politics and Jacqueline Best, Quentin Bruneau and Alexandra Ouroussoff for their generous reading and inspiring comments. In my response to them, I elaborate on the strengths and weaknesses of the “financial infrastructures” approach to credit ratings. I argue that this approach allows for better understanding the dependence of both states and markets on credit ratings and the counter-intuitive incentive structure that shapes rating agencies’ behavior. At the same time, this approach yields a structuralist argument that has limitations when exploring the role of ideational factors in credit rating decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2026-0109
Primary Topic
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on Credit Ratings: A Response to Reviews on “Rating Politics”

Zsófia Barta
Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
article

Perspectives on Credit Ratings: A Response to Reviews on “Rating Politics”

Zsófia Barta
article en

Abstract

Abstract I would like to thank Matthias Thiemann and Yuri Biondi for organizing this symposium on Rating Politics and Jacqueline Best, Quentin Bruneau and Alexandra Ouroussoff for their generous reading and inspiring comments. In my response to them, I elaborate on the strengths and weaknesses of the “financial infrastructures” approach to credit ratings. I argue that this approach allows for better understanding the dependence of both states and markets on credit ratings and the counter-intuitive incentive structure that shapes rating agencies’ behavior. At the same time, this approach yields a structuralist argument that has limitations when exploring the role of ideational factors in credit rating decisions.

Accounting Economics and Law - A Convivium
Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.