Why does collective labor re-emerge in a marketized rural society? Evidence from rural China

As global market transformation and neoliberal restructuring deepen, labor relations have become increasingly individualized and commodified. Labor relations traditionally rooted in locality, kinship, and collective organization have gradually weakened in rural societies. Evidence from some Chinese villages, however, challenge this trajectory. Collective forms of labor organization have not disappeared under marketization; they have been reconstructed and sustained through institutional innovation. Why collective labor re-emerges in marketized rural settings and how it is reproduced remain underexplored. Drawing on long-term fieldwork in a village in northwestern China, this study employs qualitative methods to examine the reconstruction of collective labor during rural marketization from a labor relations perspective. The findings show that institutional arrangements such as shareholding cooperation, co-governance, and long-term benefit sharing reshaped labor relations across three dimensions: distribution, governance, and values. Labor relations have shifted from individual gains to shared benefits, from administrative management to collaborative governance, and from economic rationality to community identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Labor History
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656x.2026.2742357
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why does collective labor re-emerge in a marketized rural society? Evidence from rural China

Deping Chu, Lanlan Wang, Chengkun HUANG
Labor History
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Why does collective labor re-emerge in a marketized rural society? Evidence from rural China

Deping Chu, Lanlan Wang, Chengkun HUANG
article en

Abstract

As global market transformation and neoliberal restructuring deepen, labor relations have become increasingly individualized and commodified. Labor relations traditionally rooted in locality, kinship, and collective organization have gradually weakened in rural societies. Evidence from some Chinese villages, however, challenge this trajectory. Collective forms of labor organization have not disappeared under marketization; they have been reconstructed and sustained through institutional innovation. Why collective labor re-emerges in marketized rural settings and how it is reproduced remain underexplored. Drawing on long-term fieldwork in a village in northwestern China, this study employs qualitative methods to examine the reconstruction of collective labor during rural marketization from a labor relations perspective. The findings show that institutional arrangements such as shareholding cooperation, co-governance, and long-term benefit sharing reshaped labor relations across three dimensions: distribution, governance, and values. Labor relations have shifted from individual gains to shared benefits, from administrative management to collaborative governance, and from economic rationality to community identity.

Labor History
Fujian Normal University (CN), Nankai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why does collective labor re-emerge in a marketized rural society? Evidence from rural China — Deping Chu, Lanlan Wang, et al. · Labor History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS