Machine Learning-Based Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining Parameters in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM)

Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is a non-traditional machining process used for producing complex geometries in conductive and difficult-to-machine materials. Its process responses depend on interacting electrical and thermal parameters, making prediction and parameter selection suitable for data-driven modelling. This study presents a computational machine-learning workflow for predicting material removal rate (MRR), surface roughness (Ra), and tool wear rate (TWR) from pulse-on time, pulse-off time, and peak current. A reproducible synthetic dataset containing 135 operating conditions was generated within the ranges Ton = 3–7 µs, Toff = 2–6 µs, and peak current = 10–30 A. A linear regression baseline, random forest regressor, and multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) were trained using a fixed 75:25 train-test split and evaluated using R2, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Across the three responses, the ANN achieved a mean test-set R2 of 0.7743, compared with 0.6210 for random forest and 0.4840 for the linear baseline. The ANN was subsequently used as a surrogate model for a weighted multi-response optimization that favoured high MRR and low Ra and TWR. The resulting model-derived operating point was Ton = 7 µs, Toff = 2 µs, and peak current = 10 A, with predicted MRR = 1.0314 mm3/min, Ra = 3.7049 µm, and TWR = 0.1001 mm3/min. Because all observations are synthetic, these values are computational proof-of-concept results and must not be interpreted as experimental measurements. The workflow is intended as a reproducible template that can be retrained and experimentally validated using laboratory EDM data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23116599
Primary Topic
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Based Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining Parameters in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM)

Tanisha Jain A M, Yashika M Gowda, Varshitha N, Vucha Durga Sushma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
article

Machine Learning-Based Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining Parameters in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM)

Tanisha Jain A M, Yashika M Gowda, Varshitha N, Vucha Durga Sushma
article en

Abstract

Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is a non-traditional machining process used for producing complex geometries in conductive and difficult-to-machine materials. Its process responses depend on interacting electrical and thermal parameters, making prediction and parameter selection suitable for data-driven modelling. This study presents a computational machine-learning workflow for predicting material removal rate (MRR), surface roughness (Ra), and tool wear rate (TWR) from pulse-on time, pulse-off time, and peak current. A reproducible synthetic dataset containing 135 operating conditions was generated within the ranges Ton = 3–7 µs, Toff = 2–6 µs, and peak current = 10–30 A. A linear regression baseline, random forest regressor, and multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) were trained using a fixed 75:25 train-test split and evaluated using R2, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean squared error (RMSE). Across the three responses, the ANN achieved a mean test-set R2 of 0.7743, compared with 0.6210 for random forest and 0.4840 for the linear baseline. The ANN was subsequently used as a surrogate model for a weighted multi-response optimization that favoured high MRR and low Ra and TWR. The resulting model-derived operating point was Ton = 7 µs, Toff = 2 µs, and peak current = 10 A, with predicted MRR = 1.0314 mm3/min, Ra = 3.7049 µm, and TWR = 0.1001 mm3/min. Because all observations are synthetic, these values are computational proof-of-concept results and must not be interpreted as experimental measurements. The workflow is intended as a reproducible template that can be retrained and experimentally validated using laboratory EDM data.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction and Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining Parameters in Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) — Tanisha Jain A M, Yashika M Gowda, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS