Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer
Abstract Objective The performance of 18 F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ( 18 F-PSMA-1007) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and bone scintigraphy (BS) for detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer patients was compared. Materials and methods One hundred prostate cancer patients (initial staging, n = 9; biochemical recurrence, n = 63; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), n = 15; m0CRPC, n = 13) underwent 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and BS. The patient-, region-, and lesion-based performances of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and BS for detecting bone metastases were evaluated by experienced readers using a five-point scale. Results Bone metastases were identified in 46 (46.0%) patients, 99 (24.8%) of the 400 regions, and 528 lesions. In the analysis, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT were 0.9985, 100%, 94.4%, and 97.0%, respectively, whereas those for BS were 0.8507, 71.7%, 88.9%, and 81.0%, respectively. AUC, sensitivity, and accuracy were significantly higher for 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT than for BS ( p = 0.00021, p = 0.00087, and p = 0.00018, respectively; McNemar test). 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detected 527 of the 528 metastatic lesions (99.8%), whereas BS detected 253 (47.9%) ( p < 0.0001). The numbers of patients with (a) no bone metastases, (b) oligometastatic disease (1–3 lesions), (c) 4–5 lesions, (d) 6–20 lesions, and (e) > 20 lesions for BS were 13, 21, 0, 8, and 4, respectively, compared with 0, 27, 3, 9, and 7, respectively, on 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT. In addition, 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT detected local recurrence ( n = 51), nodal metastases ( n = 37), and visceral metastases ( n = 4). Conclusions 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrated higher sensitivity and accuracy than BS for detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer patients.
Authors
- Tadashi Watabe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-2395)
- Kenta Kurimoto
- 野々村祝夫
- Jens Cardinale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-966X)
- Hiroki Kato (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0838-6772)
- Daisuke Katayama
- Kazuhiro Kitajima (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-996X)
- Motohide Uemura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7263-7965)
- Frederik Lars Giesel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-5593)
- Takashi Kamiya
- Sadahiro Naka
- Koji Hatano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8409-5152)
- Hidetaka Sasaki
- Yuwei Liu
Institutions
- Fukushima Medical University (JP)
- Hyogo Medical University (JP)
- Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
- Osaka University Hospital (JP)
- Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Japanese Journal of Radiology
- Published
- 2026-10-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-026-02081-8
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00