Examining Rationality in Policy Design

This study applies activities constituting rationality, organized through the global survey of rationality and its subsequent synthesis, to the context of policy decision-making: Read, Expand, Examine, Evaluate, Select, Act, Observe, Revise, and Regulate. It presents 20 questions and a recording procedure for examining policy-design discussions, and demonstrates their use with a digitally accessible primary text.The pilot applies every item to Howlett and Rayner’s (2013) article on policy portfolio design. Each item records the relevant passage location, the form of coverage, and a follow-up question. Statements in the source are distinguished from the assessor’s judgments. Assessments of an entire theory or actual policy performance require the corresponding evidence and analysis.The contribution comprises both findings from the pilot application and criteria and procedures that other researchers can use. Interested scholars can add evidence, adjust questions and scope, and review the assessment in relation to their own research. A NoteThis work connects a collaborative inquiry into rationality with policy-design research. The checklist and its assessment categories remain open to revision through use. The study presents what accessible digital materials establish alongsidequestions for further investigation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23117486
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Rationality in Policy Design

Younghoon Choi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Examining Rationality in Policy Design

Younghoon Choi
article en

Abstract

This study applies activities constituting rationality, organized through the global survey of rationality and its subsequent synthesis, to the context of policy decision-making: Read, Expand, Examine, Evaluate, Select, Act, Observe, Revise, and Regulate. It presents 20 questions and a recording procedure for examining policy-design discussions, and demonstrates their use with a digitally accessible primary text.The pilot applies every item to Howlett and Rayner’s (2013) article on policy portfolio design. Each item records the relevant passage location, the form of coverage, and a follow-up question. Statements in the source are distinguished from the assessor’s judgments. Assessments of an entire theory or actual policy performance require the corresponding evidence and analysis.The contribution comprises both findings from the pilot application and criteria and procedures that other researchers can use. Interested scholars can add evidence, adjust questions and scope, and review the assessment in relation to their own research. A NoteThis work connects a collaborative inquiry into rationality with policy-design research. The checklist and its assessment categories remain open to revision through use. The study presents what accessible digital materials establish alongsidequestions for further investigation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining Rationality in Policy Design — Younghoon Choi · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS