Human-Mediated Cross-Model Deliberation: A Jury Protocol for AI-Assisted Research

We describe a protocol for structured multi-model inquiry — human-mediated cross-model deliberation — and release, to our knowledge, the first public dataset of multi-model deliberation transcripts with claim-level provenance: verbatim jury transcripts, a consolidated verdict, and take/reject lists from a formal deliberation round in which four independent commercial AI systems were consulted separately on the same research question, with a human operator and a coordinator agent ferrying all material between them and no direct AI-to-AI contact. The protocol's components (multi-agent debate, AI juries, human-in-the-loop orchestration) are individually precedented; the contribution is the assembly as a persistent, documented institution, and the dataset as a public research artifact.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23127407
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-Mediated Cross-Model Deliberation: A Jury Protocol for AI-Assisted Research

Clifton O'Neal Franklin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Human-Mediated Cross-Model Deliberation: A Jury Protocol for AI-Assisted Research

Clifton O'Neal Franklin
article en

Abstract

We describe a protocol for structured multi-model inquiry — human-mediated cross-model deliberation — and release, to our knowledge, the first public dataset of multi-model deliberation transcripts with claim-level provenance: verbatim jury transcripts, a consolidated verdict, and take/reject lists from a formal deliberation round in which four independent commercial AI systems were consulted separately on the same research question, with a human operator and a coordinator agent ferrying all material between them and no direct AI-to-AI contact. The protocol's components (multi-agent debate, AI juries, human-in-the-loop orchestration) are individually precedented; the contribution is the assembly as a persistent, documented institution, and the dataset as a public research artifact.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.