Indianizing digital humanities: epistemic negotiations, institutional practices, and postcolonial contexts

This article examines Digital Humanities (DH) in India as a contested, unevenly institutionalised field whose trajectory cannot be explained through Euro-American histories of ‘humanities computing’. Instead, it conceptualises Indian DH as a relational formation shaped by archival inheritances, institutional improvisation, and multilingual epistemic practices. Based on interviews with practitioners across universities, research centres, and independent initiatives, the study shows how calls to ‘Indianize’ DH emerge from conditions of scarce institutional support, fragile digital infrastructures, and unstable disciplinary boundaries. The field appears organisationally dispersed – across electives, certificate courses, temporary centres, and short modules – requiring continual efforts to assert academic legitimacy. Yet DH work also extends earlier traditions of digitisation, community archiving, and public documentation that predate formal disciplinary consolidation. Placed within postcolonial debates on technocratic rationality, datafication, and knowledge politics, these findings reveal persistent frictions between imported conceptual frameworks and vernacular intellectual traditions. The article concludes that ‘Indianizing’ DH entails acknowledging these negotiations and the heterogeneous, improvised pathways through which the field continues to take shape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalisation Societies and Education
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2026.2741901
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indianizing digital humanities: epistemic negotiations, institutional practices, and postcolonial contexts

Sunanda Kar, Avishek Ray
Globalisation Societies and Education
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Indianizing digital humanities: epistemic negotiations, institutional practices, and postcolonial contexts

Sunanda Kar, Avishek Ray
article en

Abstract

This article examines Digital Humanities (DH) in India as a contested, unevenly institutionalised field whose trajectory cannot be explained through Euro-American histories of ‘humanities computing’. Instead, it conceptualises Indian DH as a relational formation shaped by archival inheritances, institutional improvisation, and multilingual epistemic practices. Based on interviews with practitioners across universities, research centres, and independent initiatives, the study shows how calls to ‘Indianize’ DH emerge from conditions of scarce institutional support, fragile digital infrastructures, and unstable disciplinary boundaries. The field appears organisationally dispersed – across electives, certificate courses, temporary centres, and short modules – requiring continual efforts to assert academic legitimacy. Yet DH work also extends earlier traditions of digitisation, community archiving, and public documentation that predate formal disciplinary consolidation. Placed within postcolonial debates on technocratic rationality, datafication, and knowledge politics, these findings reveal persistent frictions between imported conceptual frameworks and vernacular intellectual traditions. The article concludes that ‘Indianizing’ DH entails acknowledging these negotiations and the heterogeneous, improvised pathways through which the field continues to take shape.

Globalisation Societies and Education
National Institute Of Technology Silchar (IN), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.