The TOP ‐ GERD Trial: Comparative Efficacy of Tegoprazan Versus Pantoprazole in the Treatment of Erosive Oesophagitis in a Non‐Asian Population

ABSTRACT Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers provide rapid and sustained acid suppression, but tegoprazan has not been studied in non‐Asian populations. Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan 50 mg once daily with pantoprazole 40 mg once daily for healing erosive oesophagitis and improving reflux symptoms. Methods In this multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, active‐controlled trial, Mexican adults with Los Angeles grade B–D erosive oesophagitis received tegoprazan or pantoprazole for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was superior endoscopic healing at week 4. Secondary outcomes included early symptom response, complete symptom resolution, changes in symptom severity, health‐related quality of life, and adverse events. Results Seventy participants were randomized and 64 completed treatments. In the intention‐to‐treat population, endoscopic healing occurred in 88.9% receiving tegoprazan and 79.4% receiving pantoprazole ( p = 0.33). In the per‐protocol population, healing occurred in 100% and 84.4%, respectively ( p = 0.053). Among participants with Los Angeles grade C or D oesophagitis, per‐protocol healing rates were 100% with tegoprazan and 68.8% with pantoprazole ( p = 0.04). During the first treatment week, at least 50% symptom improvement occurred in 84.4% and 31.3%, respectively ( p < 0.001), and complete symptom resolution was more frequent with tegoprazan from day 1. Symptom severity and health‐related quality of life improved in both groups. Adverse events were infrequent, mild, and unrelated to treatment. Conclusions There was a nonsignificant 9.5% difference in the primary intention‐to‐treat 4‐week healing endpoint between tegoprazan and pantoprazole. Tegoprazan provided faster symptom improvement, while the per‐protocol findings and the higher healing rate observed in the exploratory severe oesophagitis subgroup were encouraging and warrant further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06991348).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.71032
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The TOP ‐ GERD Trial: Comparative Efficacy of Tegoprazan Versus Pantoprazole in the Treatment of Erosive Oesophagitis in a Non‐Asian Population

Luis Raúl Valdovinos-García, Pablo Thomas-Dupont, Peter Grube-Pagola, Chandra Prakash Gyawali et al.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

The TOP ‐ GERD Trial: Comparative Efficacy of Tegoprazan Versus Pantoprazole in the Treatment of Erosive Oesophagitis in a Non‐Asian Population

Luis Raúl Valdovinos-García, Pablo Thomas-Dupont, Peter Grube-Pagola, Chandra Prakash Gyawali, José María Remes-Troche, José Luis Vargas‐Basurto, Carlos Alberto Reyes-Medina, Gisselle Vanessa González-Hernández, A. Rafael Bernal Mendez, H. H. Barragán Cordova
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Potassium‐competitive acid blockers provide rapid and sustained acid suppression, but tegoprazan has not been studied in non‐Asian populations. Aim To compare the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan 50 mg once daily with pantoprazole 40 mg once daily for healing erosive oesophagitis and improving reflux symptoms. Methods In this multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, active‐controlled trial, Mexican adults with Los Angeles grade B–D erosive oesophagitis received tegoprazan or pantoprazole for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was superior endoscopic healing at week 4. Secondary outcomes included early symptom response, complete symptom resolution, changes in symptom severity, health‐related quality of life, and adverse events. Results Seventy participants were randomized and 64 completed treatments. In the intention‐to‐treat population, endoscopic healing occurred in 88.9% receiving tegoprazan and 79.4% receiving pantoprazole ( p = 0.33). In the per‐protocol population, healing occurred in 100% and 84.4%, respectively ( p = 0.053). Among participants with Los Angeles grade C or D oesophagitis, per‐protocol healing rates were 100% with tegoprazan and 68.8% with pantoprazole ( p = 0.04). During the first treatment week, at least 50% symptom improvement occurred in 84.4% and 31.3%, respectively ( p < 0.001), and complete symptom resolution was more frequent with tegoprazan from day 1. Symptom severity and health‐related quality of life improved in both groups. Adverse events were infrequent, mild, and unrelated to treatment. Conclusions There was a nonsignificant 9.5% difference in the primary intention‐to‐treat 4‐week healing endpoint between tegoprazan and pantoprazole. Tegoprazan provided faster symptom improvement, while the per‐protocol findings and the higher healing rate observed in the exploratory severe oesophagitis subgroup were encouraging and warrant further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06991348).

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Universidad Veracruzana (MX), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Hospital Médica Sur (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.