Explaining user-orientation in public service delivery networks: configurations of network structure, process, and context

This study explores configurations of structural, process, and contextual conditions associated with high user-orientation in public service delivery networks. Drawing on Public Service Logic, we conceptualize user-orientation and connect it with interorganizational network research. We examine six conditions and apply fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to data from sixty networks. We identify five pathways. Across these pathways, collaboration intensity and organizational simplicity consistently emerge, underscoring the importance of process factors alongside structural conditions. Network size clarifies the distinct roles of centralization and density. One pathway combines high centralization and high density with high user-orientation, nuancing prevailing views about their simultaneous presence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Management Review
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2026.2738184
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explaining user-orientation in public service delivery networks: configurations of network structure, process, and context

Dimitri Cremers, John Goedee, Antony Pemberton, Jörg Raab
Public Management Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Explaining user-orientation in public service delivery networks: configurations of network structure, process, and context

Dimitri Cremers, John Goedee, Antony Pemberton, Jörg Raab
article en

Abstract

This study explores configurations of structural, process, and contextual conditions associated with high user-orientation in public service delivery networks. Drawing on Public Service Logic, we conceptualize user-orientation and connect it with interorganizational network research. We examine six conditions and apply fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to data from sixty networks. We identify five pathways. Across these pathways, collaboration intensity and organizational simplicity consistently emerge, underscoring the importance of process factors alongside structural conditions. Network size clarifies the distinct roles of centralization and density. One pathway combines high centralization and high density with high user-orientation, nuancing prevailing views about their simultaneous presence.

Public Management Review
Tilburg University (NL), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.