Using Limestone to Assess the Impacts of Passivation and Ca-Silicate Formation on Lime Carbonation Efficiency for Looping Technology

Abstract Maximizing process efficiency in the lime looping process for direct air capture (DAC) is essential for reducing costs and energy demands to scale up this carbon dioxide (CO2) removal (CDR) technology. Here, we investigated two inefficiencies in the lime looping process: (i) surface passivation in relation to the particle size of the initial limestone powder and (ii) the presence of silicate impurities and their thermal reaction with CaCO3 during calcination. Passivation-limited carbonation to <68% completion for coarser (>25 μm) lime particles compared to ∼88% for finer (<25 μm) particles, emphasizing the need to pulverize limestone to very fine particle sizes to optimize efficiency. Limestones naturally contain unreactive impurities that will reduce CDR efficiency. For instance, the presence of 7.5 wt.% non-carbonates in the limestone used in this study reduced CO2 capture efficiency by an equal percentage. Additionally, formation of relatively inert Ca-silicates from the reaction of silicates (primarily quartz) with CaO during calcination (900 °C) further reduced efficiency by lowering CaO availability and potentially passivating reactive surfaces. Carbonation of very high-purity limestone (55.6 wt.% CaO) and synthetic CaCO3 (56.01 wt.% CaO) yielded greater reaction extents of ∼93 and ∼98%, respectively, compared to that of limestones with varying SiO2 contents (4.4–24.4 wt.%), which achieved ∼86–75% carbonation, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that the use of finely pulverized, very high-purity to impure limestones will be affected by passivation and Ca-silicate formation to varying degrees, incurring process inefficiencies of ∼10–19% due to materials not reacting during carbonation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c02701
Primary Topic
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Limestone to Assess the Impacts of Passivation and Ca-Silicate Formation on Lime Carbonation Efficiency for Looping Technology

Ian Malcom Power, Shaheen Akhtar, Jamie J. Burnett
Energy & Fuels
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
article

Using Limestone to Assess the Impacts of Passivation and Ca-Silicate Formation on Lime Carbonation Efficiency for Looping Technology

Ian Malcom Power, Shaheen Akhtar, Jamie J. Burnett
article en

Abstract

Abstract Maximizing process efficiency in the lime looping process for direct air capture (DAC) is essential for reducing costs and energy demands to scale up this carbon dioxide (CO2) removal (CDR) technology. Here, we investigated two inefficiencies in the lime looping process: (i) surface passivation in relation to the particle size of the initial limestone powder and (ii) the presence of silicate impurities and their thermal reaction with CaCO3 during calcination. Passivation-limited carbonation to <68% completion for coarser (>25 μm) lime particles compared to ∼88% for finer (<25 μm) particles, emphasizing the need to pulverize limestone to very fine particle sizes to optimize efficiency. Limestones naturally contain unreactive impurities that will reduce CDR efficiency. For instance, the presence of 7.5 wt.% non-carbonates in the limestone used in this study reduced CO2 capture efficiency by an equal percentage. Additionally, formation of relatively inert Ca-silicates from the reaction of silicates (primarily quartz) with CaO during calcination (900 °C) further reduced efficiency by lowering CaO availability and potentially passivating reactive surfaces. Carbonation of very high-purity limestone (55.6 wt.% CaO) and synthetic CaCO3 (56.01 wt.% CaO) yielded greater reaction extents of ∼93 and ∼98%, respectively, compared to that of limestones with varying SiO2 contents (4.4–24.4 wt.%), which achieved ∼86–75% carbonation, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that the use of finely pulverized, very high-purity to impure limestones will be affected by passivation and Ca-silicate formation to varying degrees, incurring process inefficiencies of ∼10–19% due to materials not reacting during carbonation.

Energy & Fuels
Trent University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Limestone to Assess the Impacts of Passivation and Ca-Silicate Formation on Lime Carbonation Efficiency for Looping Technology — Ian Malcom Power, Shaheen Akhtar, et al. · Energy & Fuels (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS