Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz in Pregnancy and Postpartum with and Without First-line Tuberculosis Drugs: Results from IMPAACT P1026s

Efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetics (PK) may be influenced by both pregnancy-related physiological changes and concurrent treatment for drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB), and intensive 24-h EFV PK data during rifampin (RIF)/ isoniazid (INH) treatment in pregnant women living with HIV (PWLHIV) and TB disease are lacking. We evaluated EFV PK in a prospective cohort of PWLHIV receiving WHO-recommended oral daily EFV alongside RIF and INH (with or without ethambutol [EMB] and pyrazinamide [PZA]). Participants enrolled between 20 and 37+6 weeks gestation and underwent steady-state intensive 24-h PK sampling during second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and 2–8 weeks postpartum (PP) when eligible. PK parameters (AUC0–24, Cmax, Cmin and CL/F) were characterized using noncompartmental analysis, and paired comparisons across pregnancy stages were made using geometric mean ratios (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals (CI); α = 0.10. PK outcomes were compared with a previously published cohort of PWLHIV without TB and evaluated against protocol-defined therapeutic targets. Of 22 participants, PK data were available for 12, 21 and 13 participants in 2T, 3T and PP, respectively. In 3T (3T↔PP: n = 13), EFV exposure was lower than PP: AUC0–24 was 19% lower (GMR 0.81 [0.69–0.95]; p = 0.008), Cmax 16% lower (GMR 0.84 [0.76–0.94]; p = 0.033), Cmin 25% lower (GMR 0.75 [0.63–0.90]; p = 0.003), and apparent oral clearance (CL/F) 24% higher (GMR 1.24 [1.06–1.46]; p = 0.057). 2T GMRs were directionally similar to 3T but were underpowered (2T↔PP: n = 4). Although median EFV concentrations exceeded therapeutic thresholds, 38% of participants did not meet target AUC0–24 or Cmin. In contrast, in the non-TB group, the EFV AUC0–24 and Cmax were similar in pregnancy and postpartum (3T AUC0–24 GMR 0.94 [0.86–1.02]; p = 0.373 and Cmax GMR 1.07 [0.95–1. 02]; p = 0.167). No infants acquired HIV during follow-up. Late pregnancy combined with DS-TB treatment is associated with lower EFV exposure. Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings, but frequent viral load monitoring is advised in PWLHIV with TB disease receiving EFV-based antiretroviral treatment. NCT00042289. Pregnant women on both efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment and tuberculosis treatment had lower efavirenz concentrations in the third trimester compared with postpartum and almost 40% of participants did not reach minimum target concentrations. Pregnant women without tuberculosis had the same efavirenz concentrations in pregnancy and postpartum. As the clinical implications are still unclear, it is advisable to evaluate viral suppression frequently when managing pregnant women on efavirenz and concurrent TB treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-026-01690-w
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz in Pregnancy and Postpartum with and Without First-line Tuberculosis Drugs: Results from IMPAACT P1026s

Mark Mirochnick, Kittipong Rungruengthanakit, Marije Van Schalkwyk, Christina A. Reding et al.
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
article

Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz in Pregnancy and Postpartum with and Without First-line Tuberculosis Drugs: Results from IMPAACT P1026s

Mark Mirochnick, Kittipong Rungruengthanakit, Marije Van Schalkwyk, Christina A. Reding, Tim Roy Cressey, Mark Fredric Cotton, Adrie Bekker, Emily Barr, Lisa M. Frenkel, Sandra K. Burchett, Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Eke, Edmund V. Capparelli, Alexander Benns, Diane G. Costello, Moyo Sikhulile, David E. Shapiro, Gonzague Jourdain, Lubbe Wiesner, Régis Kreitchmann, Pooja Mehta, Brookie M. Best, Kathleen George, Gerhard Barnard Theron, Deo Wabwire, Eric H. Decloedt, Alice Marie Stek, Renee Browning, Kevin R. Knowles, Chelsea Stotz, Amita Gupta, Anneke Hesseling, the IMPAACT P1026s Protocol Team, Nantasak Chotivanich, Anthony Garcia-Prats, Jiajia Wang, Jennifer Hughes
article en

Abstract

Efavirenz (EFV) pharmacokinetics (PK) may be influenced by both pregnancy-related physiological changes and concurrent treatment for drug-sensitive tuberculosis (DS-TB), and intensive 24-h EFV PK data during rifampin (RIF)/ isoniazid (INH) treatment in pregnant women living with HIV (PWLHIV) and TB disease are lacking. We evaluated EFV PK in a prospective cohort of PWLHIV receiving WHO-recommended oral daily EFV alongside RIF and INH (with or without ethambutol [EMB] and pyrazinamide [PZA]). Participants enrolled between 20 and 37+6 weeks gestation and underwent steady-state intensive 24-h PK sampling during second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and 2–8 weeks postpartum (PP) when eligible. PK parameters (AUC0–24, Cmax, Cmin and CL/F) were characterized using noncompartmental analysis, and paired comparisons across pregnancy stages were made using geometric mean ratios (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals (CI); α = 0.10. PK outcomes were compared with a previously published cohort of PWLHIV without TB and evaluated against protocol-defined therapeutic targets. Of 22 participants, PK data were available for 12, 21 and 13 participants in 2T, 3T and PP, respectively. In 3T (3T↔PP: n = 13), EFV exposure was lower than PP: AUC0–24 was 19% lower (GMR 0.81 [0.69–0.95]; p = 0.008), Cmax 16% lower (GMR 0.84 [0.76–0.94]; p = 0.033), Cmin 25% lower (GMR 0.75 [0.63–0.90]; p = 0.003), and apparent oral clearance (CL/F) 24% higher (GMR 1.24 [1.06–1.46]; p = 0.057). 2T GMRs were directionally similar to 3T but were underpowered (2T↔PP: n = 4). Although median EFV concentrations exceeded therapeutic thresholds, 38% of participants did not meet target AUC0–24 or Cmin. In contrast, in the non-TB group, the EFV AUC0–24 and Cmax were similar in pregnancy and postpartum (3T AUC0–24 GMR 0.94 [0.86–1.02]; p = 0.373 and Cmax GMR 1.07 [0.95–1. 02]; p = 0.167). No infants acquired HIV during follow-up. Late pregnancy combined with DS-TB treatment is associated with lower EFV exposure. Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings, but frequent viral load monitoring is advised in PWLHIV with TB disease receiving EFV-based antiretroviral treatment. NCT00042289. Pregnant women on both efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment and tuberculosis treatment had lower efavirenz concentrations in the third trimester compared with postpartum and almost 40% of participants did not reach minimum target concentrations. Pregnant women without tuberculosis had the same efavirenz concentrations in pregnancy and postpartum. As the clinical implications are still unclear, it is advisable to evaluate viral suppression frequently when managing pregnant women on efavirenz and concurrent TB treatment.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Boston University (US), University of Southern California (US), Family Health International 360 (US), National Institutes of Health (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Cape Town (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Tygerberg Hospital (ZA), University of California San Diego (US), MUJHU Research Collaboration (UG), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), Frontier Science & Technology Research Foundation, Inc. (US), Chiang Mai University (TH), Makerere University (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.