Spatial hierarchies of residential environments and wellbeing in public rental housing: the roles of residential satisfaction and generational differences

Purpose Housing environments affect residents' quality of life, yet research across spatial levels in public rental housing remains limited. This study examines how unit-, building- and complex-level environmental attributes relate to residential satisfaction (RS) and subjective wellbeing (SWB) and whether they differ between younger and middle-aged residents. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 334 public rental housing residents recruited through stratified nonprobability procedures within a professional survey agency's opt-in panel. Nine constructs combined three spatial levels (unit, building, and complex) with three environmental dimensions (physical, psychological, and social). Observed-variable path analyses estimated a primary full model and a theory-delimited shared-environment mediation model. Bias-corrected bootstrap intervals and coefficient-difference Z-tests assessed indirect effects and age-group differences, respectively. Findings Unit_Psychological, all three building-level factors, and Complex_Social were positively associated with RS, while all nine factors were positively associated with SWB. The RS → SWB path was nonsignificant, and none of the proposed indirect effects through RS was statistically significant. At the nominal 0.05 level, only the Building_Social–RS coefficient differed between age groups, with a stronger association among middle-aged residents; without adjustment for multiple comparisons, this result is exploratory. Originality/value This study uses a crossed 3 × 3 framework to estimate physical, psychological, and social relationships across unit, building, and complex levels within one model. It distinguishes direct SWB associations from the proposed RS pathway and compares structural coefficients across age groups. Its contribution lies in spatial and pathway differentiation rather than in SEM or three spatial labels alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open House International
Published
2026-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-04-2026-0146
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial hierarchies of residential environments and wellbeing in public rental housing: the roles of residential satisfaction and generational differences

Seunghee Lee
Open House International
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
article

Spatial hierarchies of residential environments and wellbeing in public rental housing: the roles of residential satisfaction and generational differences

Seunghee Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose Housing environments affect residents' quality of life, yet research across spatial levels in public rental housing remains limited. This study examines how unit-, building- and complex-level environmental attributes relate to residential satisfaction (RS) and subjective wellbeing (SWB) and whether they differ between younger and middle-aged residents. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 334 public rental housing residents recruited through stratified nonprobability procedures within a professional survey agency's opt-in panel. Nine constructs combined three spatial levels (unit, building, and complex) with three environmental dimensions (physical, psychological, and social). Observed-variable path analyses estimated a primary full model and a theory-delimited shared-environment mediation model. Bias-corrected bootstrap intervals and coefficient-difference Z-tests assessed indirect effects and age-group differences, respectively. Findings Unit_Psychological, all three building-level factors, and Complex_Social were positively associated with RS, while all nine factors were positively associated with SWB. The RS → SWB path was nonsignificant, and none of the proposed indirect effects through RS was statistically significant. At the nominal 0.05 level, only the Building_Social–RS coefficient differed between age groups, with a stronger association among middle-aged residents; without adjustment for multiple comparisons, this result is exploratory. Originality/value This study uses a crossed 3 × 3 framework to estimate physical, psychological, and social relationships across unit, building, and complex levels within one model. It distinguishes direct SWB associations from the proposed RS pathway and compares structural coefficients across age groups. Its contribution lies in spatial and pathway differentiation rather than in SEM or three spatial labels alone.

Open House International
New York State University College of Human Ecology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Spatial hierarchies of residential environments and wellbeing in public rental housing: the roles of residential satisfaction and generational differences — Seunghee Lee · Open House International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS