Prioritizing Journalistic Norms or Humanitarian Values? A Multistage Computational Analysis of Journalistic Role Performance in Humanitarian News

This study examines how journalistic roles are performed in humanitarian news. Using a multistage computational approach applied to news data from 46 international news organizations across 21 countries, we find that role performance varies systematically across topics, political systems, and organizational types. Our findings complicate the predominant tendency in humanitarian journalism scholarship to frame roles in terms of professional norms or humanitarian values. Instead, we show that role performance is multidimensional and contextually contingent. Improving humanitarian coverage therefore requires attention not only to professional practices but also to the institutional conditions that enable diverse forms of journalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990261496827
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing Journalistic Norms or Humanitarian Values? A Multistage Computational Analysis of Journalistic Role Performance in Humanitarian News

Zhe Xu, Dani Madrid‐Morales, Kate Wright, Martin Scott et al.
1 links
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Media Studies and Communication
article

Prioritizing Journalistic Norms or Humanitarian Values? A Multistage Computational Analysis of Journalistic Role Performance in Humanitarian News

Zhe Xu, Dani Madrid‐Morales, Kate Wright, Martin Scott, Shuai Wang
article en

Abstract

This study examines how journalistic roles are performed in humanitarian news. Using a multistage computational approach applied to news data from 46 international news organizations across 21 countries, we find that role performance varies systematically across topics, political systems, and organizational types. Our findings complicate the predominant tendency in humanitarian journalism scholarship to frame roles in terms of professional norms or humanitarian values. Instead, we show that role performance is multidimensional and contextually contingent. Improving humanitarian coverage therefore requires attention not only to professional practices but also to the institutional conditions that enable diverse forms of journalism.

Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
University of East Anglia (GB), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), University of Sheffield (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Prioritizing Journalistic Norms or Humanitarian Values? A Multistage Computational Analysis of Journalistic Role Performance in Humanitarian News — Zhe Xu, Dani Madrid‐Morales, et al. · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS