Establishing curriculum priorities for intensive care recovery education: an international Delphi study
PURPOSE: To effectively support recovery, intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians require training to identify patients at risk of post-intensive care syndrome and implement interventions during and after ICU admission. This study aimed to identify and prioritise curriculum topics for educating interprofessional ICU clinicians on evidence-based ICU recovery care across the continuum of critical illness. METHODS: A two-round e-Delphi study followed by a structured consensus meeting endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) was conducted. A steering committee generated an initial list of curriculum topics. In round 1, participants rated topic importance (9-point Likert scale) and suggested additional topics. In round 2, they rated newly identified topics and ranked priorities. Topics reaching consensus (≥70% rating as critical [7-9]; ≤15% rating as not important [1-3]) were discussed during the final consensus meeting. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 43.5 (±10.5) years and they were predominantly female (n = 90, 66.7%). Priority topics included early mobilisation during ICU admission, post-intensive care syndrome, delirium prevention and management, implementation of the ABCDEF bundle, and cognitive support and rehabilitation. The final set of learning modules for a future curriculum was established. CONCLUSION: Priority topics and learning modules for an expert-developed curriculum framework for ICU recovery were established with interprofessional ICU clinicians through a structured international consensus process with moderate levels of participant retention between the two Delphi rounds and full consensus agreement among experts. This framework may support in delivering recovery-focused care across the continuum of critical illness.
Authors
- Christian Stoppe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-2039)
- Stefan Josef Schaller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-9584)
- Joel N. Meyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1219-0983)
- Kate Brooks (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7428-5120)
- Eva Åkerman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1512-7341)
- Vera Karner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4017-801X)
- Arthur R. H. van Zanten (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6276-7192)
- Louise Rose (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-3972)
- Anne‐Françoise Rousseau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-6570)
- Sabrina Eggmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-7343)
- Margo M. C. van Mol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-6054)
- Mark van den Boogaard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-2903)
- Andrew J. Slack (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3544-7553)
Institutions
- St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
- University of Liège (BE)
- King's College London (GB)
- Lund University (SE)
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- University Hospital of Bern (CH)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DE)
- Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei (NL)
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
- University Children's Hospital Zurich (CH)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE)
- Monash University (AU)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Published
- 2026-11-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-026-08641-w
- Primary Topic
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00