Calligraphy after Print: Script, Self, and Society in the Material Renaissance

Abstract What did it mean to write – and to write beautifully – in the century after print? Existing scholarship on Renaissance calligraphy has focused on printed manuals, associating them with standardization, codification, and discipline. This article is the first to offer an account centred on use. Drawing on the influential manuals of the Nuremberg calligrapher Johann Neudörffer (1497–1563), alongside manuscript copies, material interventions by owners, and civic and domestic records, it traces the relationship between the Renaissance ‘invention’ of script and the calligraphic imagination it enabled in practice. At the heart of the craft of calligraphy sat the first powerful argument for what scholars today might term a psychology of writing – a special form of meaning in the making of script. Observing both the power of that claim and its instability, this article aims to establish calligraphy, and more importantly calligraphic practice, as a historiographical subject, one which it argues is of critical importance to understanding crucial elements of the early modern: self, subjectivity, and expressiveness on the one hand, and community, codified style, and discipline on the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Historical Journal
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x26102167
Primary Topic
Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Calligraphy after Print: Script, Self, and Society in the Material Renaissance

Hannah Murphy
1 links
The Historical Journal
Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
article

Calligraphy after Print: Script, Self, and Society in the Material Renaissance

Hannah Murphy
article en

Abstract

Abstract What did it mean to write – and to write beautifully – in the century after print? Existing scholarship on Renaissance calligraphy has focused on printed manuals, associating them with standardization, codification, and discipline. This article is the first to offer an account centred on use. Drawing on the influential manuals of the Nuremberg calligrapher Johann Neudörffer (1497–1563), alongside manuscript copies, material interventions by owners, and civic and domestic records, it traces the relationship between the Renaissance ‘invention’ of script and the calligraphic imagination it enabled in practice. At the heart of the craft of calligraphy sat the first powerful argument for what scholars today might term a psychology of writing – a special form of meaning in the making of script. Observing both the power of that claim and its instability, this article aims to establish calligraphy, and more importantly calligraphic practice, as a historiographical subject, one which it argues is of critical importance to understanding crucial elements of the early modern: self, subjectivity, and expressiveness on the one hand, and community, codified style, and discipline on the other.

The Historical Journal
King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon