How Consistent Are Modern DIF Methods? Evidence From an Operational General Education Test

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1910801
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How Consistent Are Modern DIF Methods? Evidence From an Operational General Education Test

Josiah Hunsberger
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

How Consistent Are Modern DIF Methods? Evidence From an Operational General Education Test

Josiah Hunsberger
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme DergisiVol. 17(3)
James Madison University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How Consistent Are Modern DIF Methods? Evidence From an Operational General Education Test — Josiah Hunsberger · Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS