The Dissemination of Standardised Care Protocol Guidelines for High‐Risk Emergency Abdominal Surgery Patients in Denmark

ABSTRACT Background Patients undergoing high‐risk emergency abdominal surgery have a high risk of postoperative complications and mortality. International studies suggest that standardised care protocol guidelines may improve outcomes, yet little is known about the dissemination of such guidelines in Denmark. Methods We conducted a nationwide cross‐sectional survey among Danish public hospitals treating high‐risk emergency abdominal surgical patients. Anaesthesiologists and surgeons responsible for emergency abdominal surgery were invited to report on the presence of joint care protocols, including core components, audit practices and barriers to implementation. Results A total of 35 out of 41 eligible departments (85%) responded, representing 20 out of 23 hospitals. Almost all participating hospitals (95%) reported having a joint guideline for high‐risk emergency abdominal surgery. The most included components were antibiotics within 3 h (90%), CT scan within 2 h (90%) and intended surgery within 6 h. Only 47% of hospitals showed agreement between surgeons and anaesthesiologists on six or more core components. Audits were conducted in 90% of hospitals, with variations between departments in audit methods and focus. The most frequently reported barriers were limited resources in specialised units, surgical capacity and time constraints. Conclusion This survey showed that nearly all Danish hospitals treating high‐risk emergency abdominal surgical patients reported having a joint guideline endorsed by both the surgical and anaesthesiology departments. Time‐critical components aiming at early diagnosis and treatment were the most frequently included core components in the guideline. Editorial Comment This survey‐based report describes how many Danish hospitals have a local guiding document for perioperative anaesthesia and surgical care for cases of high‐risk emergency abdominal surgery. The most common components of these across hospitals are described.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70341
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Dissemination of Standardised Care Protocol Guidelines for High‐Risk Emergency Abdominal Surgery Patients in Denmark

Morten Vester‐Andersen, Jakob Burcharth, Kim Wildgaard, Ines Victoria Føns Gjørup
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

The Dissemination of Standardised Care Protocol Guidelines for High‐Risk Emergency Abdominal Surgery Patients in Denmark

Morten Vester‐Andersen, Jakob Burcharth, Kim Wildgaard, Ines Victoria Føns Gjørup
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Patients undergoing high‐risk emergency abdominal surgery have a high risk of postoperative complications and mortality. International studies suggest that standardised care protocol guidelines may improve outcomes, yet little is known about the dissemination of such guidelines in Denmark. Methods We conducted a nationwide cross‐sectional survey among Danish public hospitals treating high‐risk emergency abdominal surgical patients. Anaesthesiologists and surgeons responsible for emergency abdominal surgery were invited to report on the presence of joint care protocols, including core components, audit practices and barriers to implementation. Results A total of 35 out of 41 eligible departments (85%) responded, representing 20 out of 23 hospitals. Almost all participating hospitals (95%) reported having a joint guideline for high‐risk emergency abdominal surgery. The most included components were antibiotics within 3 h (90%), CT scan within 2 h (90%) and intended surgery within 6 h. Only 47% of hospitals showed agreement between surgeons and anaesthesiologists on six or more core components. Audits were conducted in 90% of hospitals, with variations between departments in audit methods and focus. The most frequently reported barriers were limited resources in specialised units, surgical capacity and time constraints. Conclusion This survey showed that nearly all Danish hospitals treating high‐risk emergency abdominal surgical patients reported having a joint guideline endorsed by both the surgical and anaesthesiology departments. Time‐critical components aiming at early diagnosis and treatment were the most frequently included core components in the guideline. Editorial Comment This survey‐based report describes how many Danish hospitals have a local guiding document for perioperative anaesthesia and surgical care for cases of high‐risk emergency abdominal surgery. The most common components of these across hospitals are described.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 70(10)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Herlev Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.