Microsleep Raw-EEG Classification

Abstract The ability of univariate convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) to classify raw EEG has been demonstrated for various biomedical applications. Using an extensive data set from five driving simulation studies, we investigate whether 1D-CNN is also effective for short-term EEG recorded during microsleep episodes. A standard machine learning solution based on Support Vector Machines (SVM) was developed as a reference methodology. Utilising repeated random crossvalidation, steady convergence with minor fluctuations was observed. It was found that reducing the number of input variables of 1D-CNN using local averaging improved accuracy. Results show that average validation accuracies of 96.3% with SVM and 95.2% with 1D-CNN can be achieved. Sensitivity and specificity revealed insignificant differences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2026-0231
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Microsleep Raw-EEG Classification

David Sommer, Adolf Schenka, Martin Gölz, Tobias Häuser
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Microsleep Raw-EEG Classification

David Sommer, Adolf Schenka, Martin Gölz, Tobias Häuser
article en

Abstract

Abstract The ability of univariate convolutional neural networks (1D-CNNs) to classify raw EEG has been demonstrated for various biomedical applications. Using an extensive data set from five driving simulation studies, we investigate whether 1D-CNN is also effective for short-term EEG recorded during microsleep episodes. A standard machine learning solution based on Support Vector Machines (SVM) was developed as a reference methodology. Utilising repeated random crossvalidation, steady convergence with minor fluctuations was observed. It was found that reducing the number of input variables of 1D-CNN using local averaging improved accuracy. Results show that average validation accuracies of 96.3% with SVM and 95.2% with 1D-CNN can be achieved. Sensitivity and specificity revealed insignificant differences.

Current Directions in Biomedical EngineeringVol. 12(1)
Schmalkalden University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.