Influence of Driving Experience on Visual Search, Attentional Cue Utilization, and Inhibitory Control: Implications for Driving Performance

Background: Driving requires the integration of visual search, attentional processing, cue, and response inhibition. Driving experience and regular driving exposure may influence these cognitive processes, but their relative effects across specific cognitive performance remain unclear. Methods: This cross-sectional inter-group comparative study included 47 subjects—23 experienced and 24 non-experienced drivers. Participants completed visual search, Posner cueing, and stop-signal paradigms using PsyToolkit. Group differences were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests, with correlations assessing associations between driving experience and cognitive performance. Results: Experienced drivers showed a lower mean SSRT than non-experienced drivers (226.9 ± 20.1 ms vs. 237.3 ± 10.9 ms; unadjusted p = 0.028), with the difference reduced after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.056). Mean Go reaction times were similar between groups. In the cueing task, experienced drivers showed reduced reaction times for both valid (~410 ms) and invalid (~470 ms) trials (U = 125.5, p = 0.001), indicating more efficient attentional reorienting. Visual Search Time was also lower in experienced than non-experienced drivers (median 950 ms vs. 1050 ms; p = 0.238). Conclusion: Driving experience was associated with faster inhibitory responses and better attentional efficiency, with smaller differences in visual search performance. These findings suggest experience-related cognitive adaptation and support the inclusion of attention and response-inhibition training in non-experienced driver education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19050110
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Influence of Driving Experience on Visual Search, Attentional Cue Utilization, and Inhibitory Control: Implications for Driving Performance

Prem Sudhakar Lawrence, Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Influence of Driving Experience on Visual Search, Attentional Cue Utilization, and Inhibitory Control: Implications for Driving Performance

Prem Sudhakar Lawrence, Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan
article en

Abstract

Background: Driving requires the integration of visual search, attentional processing, cue, and response inhibition. Driving experience and regular driving exposure may influence these cognitive processes, but their relative effects across specific cognitive performance remain unclear. Methods: This cross-sectional inter-group comparative study included 47 subjects—23 experienced and 24 non-experienced drivers. Participants completed visual search, Posner cueing, and stop-signal paradigms using PsyToolkit. Group differences were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric tests, with correlations assessing associations between driving experience and cognitive performance. Results: Experienced drivers showed a lower mean SSRT than non-experienced drivers (226.9 ± 20.1 ms vs. 237.3 ± 10.9 ms; unadjusted p = 0.028), with the difference reduced after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.056). Mean Go reaction times were similar between groups. In the cueing task, experienced drivers showed reduced reaction times for both valid (~410 ms) and invalid (~470 ms) trials (U = 125.5, p = 0.001), indicating more efficient attentional reorienting. Visual Search Time was also lower in experienced than non-experienced drivers (median 950 ms vs. 1050 ms; p = 0.238). Conclusion: Driving experience was associated with faster inhibitory responses and better attentional efficiency, with smaller differences in visual search performance. These findings suggest experience-related cognitive adaptation and support the inclusion of attention and response-inhibition training in non-experienced driver education.

Journal of Eye Movement ResearchVol. 19(5)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.