Response of greenhouse cucumber to growth stage-based irrigation and fertigation scheduling

Efficient cucumber production under protected conditions requires precise synchronization of irrigation and nutrient supply with crop demand. A two‑year experiment was conducted employing 2 × 6 factorial arrangements comprising two irrigation regimes (I1-0.8 ETc during the first 2 months and 1.0 ETc thereafter, and I2- 0.8 ETc during the first 2 months and 1.0 ETc thereafter) and six fertilizer schedules viz. F1- 75% N, F2- 75% NK, F3-75% NPK, F4- 50% NPK, F5- 75% NK + 50% P and F6- 50% NK + 25% P fertigation and remaining nutrient requirements supplied as basal, resulting in 12 combinations laid out in a completely randomized design. I2F5 treatment promoted better root development and resulted in the highest yield (234.42 tonne ha−1), net returns (US $ 49,420.7 ha−1), and benefit–cost ratio (5.11). In comparison, deficit irrigation (I1) improved fruit quality (total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, and sugar fractions) and increased water use efficiency and water productivity by 11.50% and 14.06%, respectively, along with higher returns per unit water used. Overall, the results highlighted a trade-off between yield, fruit quality, and water productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Vegetable Science
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2026.2737325
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Response of greenhouse cucumber to growth stage-based irrigation and fertigation scheduling

Bhawna Babal, Praveen Thakur, Prikxit, Aarush Lal et al.
International Journal of Vegetable Science
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

Response of greenhouse cucumber to growth stage-based irrigation and fertigation scheduling

Bhawna Babal, Praveen Thakur, Prikxit, Aarush Lal, Sanjeev Kumar Sandal
article en

Abstract

Efficient cucumber production under protected conditions requires precise synchronization of irrigation and nutrient supply with crop demand. A two‑year experiment was conducted employing 2 × 6 factorial arrangements comprising two irrigation regimes (I1-0.8 ETc during the first 2 months and 1.0 ETc thereafter, and I2- 0.8 ETc during the first 2 months and 1.0 ETc thereafter) and six fertilizer schedules viz. F1- 75% N, F2- 75% NK, F3-75% NPK, F4- 50% NPK, F5- 75% NK + 50% P and F6- 50% NK + 25% P fertigation and remaining nutrient requirements supplied as basal, resulting in 12 combinations laid out in a completely randomized design. I2F5 treatment promoted better root development and resulted in the highest yield (234.42 tonne ha−1), net returns (US $ 49,420.7 ha−1), and benefit–cost ratio (5.11). In comparison, deficit irrigation (I1) improved fruit quality (total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, and sugar fractions) and increased water use efficiency and water productivity by 11.50% and 14.06%, respectively, along with higher returns per unit water used. Overall, the results highlighted a trade-off between yield, fruit quality, and water productivity.

International Journal of Vegetable Science
Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (IN), Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya (IN), Shoolini University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.