The Problem With Problem Load: Reconceptualizing Load in the Multiple Streams Framework

ABSTRACT What happens when policymaking systems buckle under pressure, disrupting consensus and stalling decision‐making? Drawing on the Multiple Streams Framework, we show that the existing concept capturing this stress, Problem Load, has been both misinterpreted and overstretched. We reconceptualize load separately within each stream and coupling process as Issue Load , Proposal Load , Justification Load , and Selection Load . Rather than measuring the volume or complexity of inputs, these concepts focus on the consensus‐contention dynamics that generate internal system stress. Each load manifests through observable indicators such as stakeholder disagreement, narrative competition, and fragmented discourse. Our reconceptualization sharpens MSF's theoretical precision and equips practitioners with diagnostic tools. It also lays the groundwork for harder questions: what happens when load is deliberately imposed, or when high load tips over into overload, and whether governance systems can recover.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Policy Research
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70127
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Problem With Problem Load: Reconceptualizing Load in the Multiple Streams Framework

Dana A. Dolan, Nikolaos Zahariadis
Review of Policy Research
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

The Problem With Problem Load: Reconceptualizing Load in the Multiple Streams Framework

Dana A. Dolan, Nikolaos Zahariadis
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT What happens when policymaking systems buckle under pressure, disrupting consensus and stalling decision‐making? Drawing on the Multiple Streams Framework, we show that the existing concept capturing this stress, Problem Load, has been both misinterpreted and overstretched. We reconceptualize load separately within each stream and coupling process as Issue Load , Proposal Load , Justification Load , and Selection Load . Rather than measuring the volume or complexity of inputs, these concepts focus on the consensus‐contention dynamics that generate internal system stress. Each load manifests through observable indicators such as stakeholder disagreement, narrative competition, and fragmented discourse. Our reconceptualization sharpens MSF's theoretical precision and equips practitioners with diagnostic tools. It also lays the groundwork for harder questions: what happens when load is deliberately imposed, or when high load tips over into overload, and whether governance systems can recover.

Review of Policy ResearchVol. 43(6)
Rhodes College (US), George Mason University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.