Seasonal Dynamics, Botanical Origin, and Yield of Apis mellifera Propolis in the Mexican Altiplano: Influence of Precipitation, Phenology, and Harvesting Methods

Propolis yield and composition fluctuate with environmental factors and hive management. In a two-year longitudinal study (2022–2024), we evaluated the seasonal dynamics of propolis production across two apiaries in the Mexican Altiplano during the dry and rainy seasons. We conducted monthly harvesting using three collector types: black polyurethane collectors (G1), beige polyurethane collectors (G2), and flexible polyethylene mosquito mesh (G3), distributed among 24 standardized Apis mellifera colonies (n = 8 per treatment; 576 repeated monthly harvests). Palynological analysis identified 39 species belonging to 38 genera and 23 families, with a clear predominance of herbaceous and ruderal forms (Brassica rapa as the main pollen type). The overall mean yield was 9.02 ± 0.58 g/colony/month. Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) revealed significant temporal variation by month (F11,231 = 28.45, p < 0.001) and season (F1,21 = 14.12, p = 0.001). Propolis biomass showed a clear bimodal pattern, peaking in April (20.25 g/colony) during vegetative bud burst, dropping in July (6.25 g/colony), and rebounding in September–October (9.77–9.92 g/colony), coinciding with leaf senescence and pre-winter nest sealing. Monthly production showed a moderate negative linear correlation with cumulative precipitation (r = −0.422, p = 0.040, R2 = 0.178). Conversely, collector design did not result in statistically significant differences in harvested biomass (G1: 6.88 g, G2: 8.98 g, G3: 11.21 g; F2,21 = 2.14, p = 0.142). These findings demonstrate that propolis collection in the Mexican Altiplano is primarily synchronized with regional plant phenology and constrained by precipitation regimes rather than collector design. Consequently, the practical selection of harvesting devices should be guided by operational handling efficiency, economic cost, and raw product cleanliness, rather than expectations of higher quantitative yield.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insects
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects17101013
Primary Topic
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Seasonal Dynamics, Botanical Origin, and Yield of Apis mellifera Propolis in the Mexican Altiplano: Influence of Precipitation, Phenology, and Harvesting Methods

Marco Aurelio Rodríguez-Monroy, Manuel Andrés González-Toimil, Víctor Manuel Díaz-Sánchez, María Margarita Canales-Martinez et al.
Insects
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
article

Seasonal Dynamics, Botanical Origin, and Yield of Apis mellifera Propolis in the Mexican Altiplano: Influence of Precipitation, Phenology, and Harvesting Methods

Marco Aurelio Rodríguez-Monroy, Manuel Andrés González-Toimil, Víctor Manuel Díaz-Sánchez, María Margarita Canales-Martinez, Lysett Corona-Gómez, Jose Juan Alcivar-Saldaña, Noe Garcia-Cedillo
article en

Abstract

Propolis yield and composition fluctuate with environmental factors and hive management. In a two-year longitudinal study (2022–2024), we evaluated the seasonal dynamics of propolis production across two apiaries in the Mexican Altiplano during the dry and rainy seasons. We conducted monthly harvesting using three collector types: black polyurethane collectors (G1), beige polyurethane collectors (G2), and flexible polyethylene mosquito mesh (G3), distributed among 24 standardized Apis mellifera colonies (n = 8 per treatment; 576 repeated monthly harvests). Palynological analysis identified 39 species belonging to 38 genera and 23 families, with a clear predominance of herbaceous and ruderal forms (Brassica rapa as the main pollen type). The overall mean yield was 9.02 ± 0.58 g/colony/month. Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) revealed significant temporal variation by month (F11,231 = 28.45, p < 0.001) and season (F1,21 = 14.12, p = 0.001). Propolis biomass showed a clear bimodal pattern, peaking in April (20.25 g/colony) during vegetative bud burst, dropping in July (6.25 g/colony), and rebounding in September–October (9.77–9.92 g/colony), coinciding with leaf senescence and pre-winter nest sealing. Monthly production showed a moderate negative linear correlation with cumulative precipitation (r = −0.422, p = 0.040, R2 = 0.178). Conversely, collector design did not result in statistically significant differences in harvested biomass (G1: 6.88 g, G2: 8.98 g, G3: 11.21 g; F2,21 = 2.14, p = 0.142). These findings demonstrate that propolis collection in the Mexican Altiplano is primarily synchronized with regional plant phenology and constrained by precipitation regimes rather than collector design. Consequently, the practical selection of harvesting devices should be guided by operational handling efficiency, economic cost, and raw product cleanliness, rather than expectations of higher quantitative yield.

InsectsVol. 17(10)
Universidad de Cuautitlán Izcalli (MX)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.