What makes axial spondyloarthritis difficult to manage? A qualitative study of patient and rheumatologist perspectives

Objective To explore how patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and rheumatologists perceive and define difficult-to-manage axSpA (D2M-axSpA), with particular attention to the third criterion of the ASAS definition, referring to "signs/symptoms perceived as problematic". Methods This qualitative study used semi-structured individual interviews with patients with axSpA who had received at least three b/tsDMARDs and rheumatologists experienced in axSpA care. Participants were recruited in France. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was performed iteratively, and themes were refined through team discussions. Results Fourteen rheumatologists and 13 patients participated in this study. Five interconnected themes described how D2M-axSpA is understood: (1) uncertainty in attributing persistent symptoms to inflammatory or non-inflammatory mechanisms; (2) persistent symptom burden, particularly pain, fatigue, and functional limitations; (3) patient–physician relationship dynamics, including communication and discordant interpretations of symptoms; (4) healthcare system constraints, such as delays in access to multidisciplinary care; and (5) therapeutic constraints, including limited treatment options, comorbidities, and uncertainty regarding treatment escalation. Patients mainly emphasized the lived burden of symptoms and functional impact, whereas rheumatologists primarily highlighted attributional uncertainty and challenges in interpreting persistent symptoms. Conclusion D2M-axSpA is perceived as a multidimensional situation resulting from interactions between symptom burden, attributional uncertainty, relational dynamics, healthcare system constraints, and therapeutic decision-making. These findings suggest that the third criterion of the ASAS definition reflects a broader clinical context beyond refractory inflammation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2026-0336
Primary Topic
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What makes axial spondyloarthritis difficult to manage? A qualitative study of patient and rheumatologist perspectives

Frédéric Meyer, Daniel Wendling, Mickaël Chouk, Clément Prati et al.
The Journal of Rheumatology
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
article

What makes axial spondyloarthritis difficult to manage? A qualitative study of patient and rheumatologist perspectives

Frédéric Meyer, Daniel Wendling, Mickaël Chouk, Clément Prati, Olivier Fakih, F. Verhœven
article en

Abstract

Objective To explore how patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and rheumatologists perceive and define difficult-to-manage axSpA (D2M-axSpA), with particular attention to the third criterion of the ASAS definition, referring to "signs/symptoms perceived as problematic". Methods This qualitative study used semi-structured individual interviews with patients with axSpA who had received at least three b/tsDMARDs and rheumatologists experienced in axSpA care. Participants were recruited in France. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was performed iteratively, and themes were refined through team discussions. Results Fourteen rheumatologists and 13 patients participated in this study. Five interconnected themes described how D2M-axSpA is understood: (1) uncertainty in attributing persistent symptoms to inflammatory or non-inflammatory mechanisms; (2) persistent symptom burden, particularly pain, fatigue, and functional limitations; (3) patient–physician relationship dynamics, including communication and discordant interpretations of symptoms; (4) healthcare system constraints, such as delays in access to multidisciplinary care; and (5) therapeutic constraints, including limited treatment options, comorbidities, and uncertainty regarding treatment escalation. Patients mainly emphasized the lived burden of symptoms and functional impact, whereas rheumatologists primarily highlighted attributional uncertainty and challenges in interpreting persistent symptoms. Conclusion D2M-axSpA is perceived as a multidimensional situation resulting from interactions between symptom burden, attributional uncertainty, relational dynamics, healthcare system constraints, and therapeutic decision-making. These findings suggest that the third criterion of the ASAS definition reflects a broader clinical context beyond refractory inflammation.

The Journal of Rheumatology
Inserm (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.