A Contemporary Review of Resectability and Treatment Strategies for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Part 1—Diagnosis, Defining Resectability, and Management of Upfront Resectable and Synchronous Disease

Background/Objectives: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) remain a major determinant of long-term outcome. Although hepatic resection offers the best chance of durable survival, the definition of resectability has evolved beyond technical feasibility alone. This review aims to provide a structured overview of contemporary management strategies for patients with upfront technically resectable or synchronous CRLM, with emphasis on patient selection, tumor biology, perioperative systemic therapy, margin strategy, and surgical sequencing. Methods: A structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies published between 2000 and 2026. Eligible studies evaluated surgical, liver-directed, or systemic treatment strategies for CRLMs and reported outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence, margin status, or perioperative morbidity. Given the heterogeneity of the available evidence, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Contemporary management of CRLMs requires integration of patient fitness, technical resectability, and tumor biology. In upfront technically resectable disease, routine neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not consistently improved overall survival, whereas selected high-risk patients may benefit from short-course preoperative therapy. Margin strategy is increasingly biology-informed rather than based on a universal margin width. In synchronous disease, no single operative sequence is superior for all patients; treatment should be selected according to disease burden, operative complexity, and the need to preserve access to systemic therapy. Conclusions: Management of upfront resectable and synchronous CRLMs should be individualized through multidisciplinary assessment. Current evidence supports a risk-adapted strategy that integrates technical feasibility, patient factors, and tumor biology while recognizing persistent uncertainty regarding optimal chemotherapy timing and surgical sequencing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18193165
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Contemporary Review of Resectability and Treatment Strategies for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Part 1—Diagnosis, Defining Resectability, and Management of Upfront Resectable and Synchronous Disease

Nicholas Meti, Peter P. Metrakos, Jennifer A. Kalil, René A. Adam
1 citations
Cancers
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
4.16
article

A Contemporary Review of Resectability and Treatment Strategies for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Part 1—Diagnosis, Defining Resectability, and Management of Upfront Resectable and Synchronous Disease

Nicholas Meti, Peter P. Metrakos, Jennifer A. Kalil, René A. Adam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) remain a major determinant of long-term outcome. Although hepatic resection offers the best chance of durable survival, the definition of resectability has evolved beyond technical feasibility alone. This review aims to provide a structured overview of contemporary management strategies for patients with upfront technically resectable or synchronous CRLM, with emphasis on patient selection, tumor biology, perioperative systemic therapy, margin strategy, and surgical sequencing. Methods: A structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies published between 2000 and 2026. Eligible studies evaluated surgical, liver-directed, or systemic treatment strategies for CRLMs and reported outcomes including overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence, margin status, or perioperative morbidity. Given the heterogeneity of the available evidence, findings were synthesized narratively. Results: Contemporary management of CRLMs requires integration of patient fitness, technical resectability, and tumor biology. In upfront technically resectable disease, routine neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not consistently improved overall survival, whereas selected high-risk patients may benefit from short-course preoperative therapy. Margin strategy is increasingly biology-informed rather than based on a universal margin width. In synchronous disease, no single operative sequence is superior for all patients; treatment should be selected according to disease burden, operative complexity, and the need to preserve access to systemic therapy. Conclusions: Management of upfront resectable and synchronous CRLMs should be individualized through multidisciplinary assessment. Current evidence supports a risk-adapted strategy that integrates technical feasibility, patient factors, and tumor biology while recognizing persistent uncertainty regarding optimal chemotherapy timing and surgical sequencing.

CancersVol. 18(19)
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Paul-Brousse (FR), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
4.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.