Identifying gaps and needs in education and career support programs for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: An EU-CAYAS-NET focus group study

Background Advances in cancer treatment have improved survival among children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs). However, CAYA cancer survivors are at increased risk of long-term physical, cognitive, psychological, and social consequences of cancer and its treatment, including challenges with educational attainment and employment. Education and career support programs have the potential to improve social participation among this population. Aim The study aim was to identify gaps and needs in education and career support programs for CAYA cancer survivors. The findings are intended to inform the development and refinement of interventions that enhance social participation and quality of life. Methods This study was conducted as part of the European Network of Youth Cancer Survivors (EU-CAYAS-NET) project. A qualitative design was used, involving two focus groups with CAYA cancer survivors in Austria and the Netherlands. Participants were recruited through clinics, patient organizations, and social media. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. A brief questionnaire captured demographic and clinical characteristics. Results Eleven survivors participated (Austria: 7; Netherlands: 4), all with experience in education and career support programs. Analysis of 557 codes revealed three main categories: individual behaviors (18%), sociodemographic and health factors (8%), and environmental conditions (74%). Environmental conditions dominated and included the domains infrastructure, support providers, employers, healthcare professionals, and interpersonal relationships. Participants emphasized the need for accessible systems, tailored support, proactive providers, employer engagement, and better integration between stakeholders such as healthcare professionals and vocational services. Conclusion CAYA cancer survivors experience gaps in education and career support. Beyond program availability, clear structures, effective referral pathways, and specialized, coordinated support from multiple stakeholders are needed. Our findings provide implications to guide interventions that improve social participation and quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EJC Paediatric Oncology
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcped.2026.100554
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Identifying gaps and needs in education and career support programs for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: An EU-CAYAS-NET focus group study

Hannah Gsell, Kerstin Krottendorfer, Doris Hoffmann‐Lamplmair, Helena J. H. van der Pal et al.
EJC Paediatric Oncology
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Identifying gaps and needs in education and career support programs for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: An EU-CAYAS-NET focus group study

Hannah Gsell, Kerstin Krottendorfer, Doris Hoffmann‐Lamplmair, Helena J. H. van der Pal, Carina Ursula Schneider, Katie Rizvi, Samira Essiaf, Neringa Čiakienė, Ulrike Leiss, Jaap G. den Hartogh, Kylie B O'Brien, Leontien C. M. Kremer, Anita Kienesberger, Jikke Wams, Begonya Nafria Escalera
article en

Abstract

Background Advances in cancer treatment have improved survival among children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs). However, CAYA cancer survivors are at increased risk of long-term physical, cognitive, psychological, and social consequences of cancer and its treatment, including challenges with educational attainment and employment. Education and career support programs have the potential to improve social participation among this population. Aim The study aim was to identify gaps and needs in education and career support programs for CAYA cancer survivors. The findings are intended to inform the development and refinement of interventions that enhance social participation and quality of life. Methods This study was conducted as part of the European Network of Youth Cancer Survivors (EU-CAYAS-NET) project. A qualitative design was used, involving two focus groups with CAYA cancer survivors in Austria and the Netherlands. Participants were recruited through clinics, patient organizations, and social media. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis. A brief questionnaire captured demographic and clinical characteristics. Results Eleven survivors participated (Austria: 7; Netherlands: 4), all with experience in education and career support programs. Analysis of 557 codes revealed three main categories: individual behaviors (18%), sociodemographic and health factors (8%), and environmental conditions (74%). Environmental conditions dominated and included the domains infrastructure, support providers, employers, healthcare professionals, and interpersonal relationships. Participants emphasized the need for accessible systems, tailored support, proactive providers, employer engagement, and better integration between stakeholders such as healthcare professionals and vocational services. Conclusion CAYA cancer survivors experience gaps in education and career support. Beyond program availability, clear structures, effective referral pathways, and specialized, coordinated support from multiple stakeholders are needed. Our findings provide implications to guide interventions that improve social participation and quality of life.

EJC Paediatric Oncology
European Society for Paediatric Oncology (BE), Princess Máxima Center (NL), Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.