Response of wild bee assemblages and floral resources to management of restored wetlands in central New York

To effectively protect wild bee pollinators and the services they provide, it is critical to understand habitat use patterns across a diversity of cover types. Wetlands are underrepresented in bee surveys, and although wetland restoration produces conservation benefits for birds, how hydrological management influences bee assemblages and availability of floral resources is still poorly known. In this study, actively (full or partial water drawdowns) and passively managed restored wetlands in central New York were surveyed to characterize plant and bee assemblages, June–September 2019 and 2020. Over 9,000 bees were collected using pan traps and sweep netting, representing ≥ 109 species in 25 genera. Environmental variables, e.g., percent open water and mudflat frequency, differed among management treatments, and were better predictors of entomophilous plant species composition, bee richness, and/or entomophilous plant richness and occurrence than management treatment alone. Entomophilous plant occurrence varied negatively with invasive graminoid occurrence. Although bee assemblage composition was best explained by phenological turnover, diverse moist-soil flowers in late summer and long-blooming emergent flowers were important to generalists and specialist bees. Emergent wetlands offered valuable floral resources for wild bees, making wetland restoration and management a useful pollinator conservation approach. Maintaining a complex of wetlands by cycling through different hydrological conditions, and controlling densities of invasive plants, can diversify and increase resources available for bees, while also meeting management goals for wetland wildlife.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wetlands Ecology and Management
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-026-10191-3
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Response of wild bee assemblages and floral resources to management of restored wetlands in central New York

Molly Mary Jacobson, Melissa K. Fierke, Michael L. Schummer, Paige Chesshire et al.
Wetlands Ecology and Management
Plant and animal studies
article

Response of wild bee assemblages and floral resources to management of restored wetlands in central New York

Molly Mary Jacobson, Melissa K. Fierke, Michael L. Schummer, Paige Chesshire, Donald J. Leopold
article en

Abstract

To effectively protect wild bee pollinators and the services they provide, it is critical to understand habitat use patterns across a diversity of cover types. Wetlands are underrepresented in bee surveys, and although wetland restoration produces conservation benefits for birds, how hydrological management influences bee assemblages and availability of floral resources is still poorly known. In this study, actively (full or partial water drawdowns) and passively managed restored wetlands in central New York were surveyed to characterize plant and bee assemblages, June–September 2019 and 2020. Over 9,000 bees were collected using pan traps and sweep netting, representing ≥ 109 species in 25 genera. Environmental variables, e.g., percent open water and mudflat frequency, differed among management treatments, and were better predictors of entomophilous plant species composition, bee richness, and/or entomophilous plant richness and occurrence than management treatment alone. Entomophilous plant occurrence varied negatively with invasive graminoid occurrence. Although bee assemblage composition was best explained by phenological turnover, diverse moist-soil flowers in late summer and long-blooming emergent flowers were important to generalists and specialist bees. Emergent wetlands offered valuable floral resources for wild bees, making wetland restoration and management a useful pollinator conservation approach. Maintaining a complex of wetlands by cycling through different hydrological conditions, and controlling densities of invasive plants, can diversify and increase resources available for bees, while also meeting management goals for wetland wildlife.

Wetlands Ecology and ManagementVol. 34(5)
Purchase College (US), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.