Motivational Factors in Interdisciplinary Design Collaboration

This study investigates design collaborations in interdisciplinary work settings, where actors from product design, product development, product management, marketing, production, purchasing, and quality units participate in product design processes, with the aim of contributing to both its theoretical understanding and effective management. By bridging research on design collaboration with motivational theory, the study argues that motivation constitutes a critical yet underexplored dimension of interdisciplinary design collaborations. Adopting an interpretivist approach, the research explores the experiences of twenty-five experts from diverse disciplines through semi-structured interviews. The findings identify three sets of motivational factors: (1) design-specific intrinsic motivational factors of collaboration—belief in the project, continuous progress, and continuous learning; (2) relational factors as distinct motivational drivers through constructive conflict and a sense of “we”; and (3) extrinsic factors that condition rather than generate motivation by shaping the context of collaboration. This article proposes a layered model in which intrinsic, relational, and extrinsic factors interact dynamically to sustain collaborative engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162x/cgp/a179
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Motivational Factors in Interdisciplinary Design Collaboration

Pınar Kaygan, K. Gülen Göz
The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
Design Education and Practice
article

Motivational Factors in Interdisciplinary Design Collaboration

Pınar Kaygan, K. Gülen Göz
article en

Abstract

This study investigates design collaborations in interdisciplinary work settings, where actors from product design, product development, product management, marketing, production, purchasing, and quality units participate in product design processes, with the aim of contributing to both its theoretical understanding and effective management. By bridging research on design collaboration with motivational theory, the study argues that motivation constitutes a critical yet underexplored dimension of interdisciplinary design collaborations. Adopting an interpretivist approach, the research explores the experiences of twenty-five experts from diverse disciplines through semi-structured interviews. The findings identify three sets of motivational factors: (1) design-specific intrinsic motivational factors of collaboration—belief in the project, continuous progress, and continuous learning; (2) relational factors as distinct motivational drivers through constructive conflict and a sense of “we”; and (3) extrinsic factors that condition rather than generate motivation by shaping the context of collaboration. This article proposes a layered model in which intrinsic, relational, and extrinsic factors interact dynamically to sustain collaborative engagement.

The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice
Art Academy of Latvia (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Motivational Factors in Interdisciplinary Design Collaboration — Pınar Kaygan, K. Gülen Göz · The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS