Recent South American Court Cases: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay

Repaginated 7 October 2026: content unchanged. Pages 409-441 of Vol. 1 No. 2 (formerly 393-425). Repaginated 5 October 2026: content unchanged; pages 393-425 of Vol. 1 No. 2 (formerly 389-421), following the version 1.1.0 corrections to the Foundations entries 000 and 007–010.This installment surveys ten South American jurisdictions: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay, with a coverage note on Suriname and French Guiana. Most of the material is expropriation. Brazil's Supreme Federal Tribunal is to decide whether possession without registered title is compensable, and has held that the difference between deposit and final award is paid through the precatório queue. Colombia's Constitutional Court treats the commercial appraisal as an input to compensation, not the compensation itself. Argentina's Ley 21.499 confines the indemnity to objective value; a Río Negro court ran interest from dispossession. Baseline studies state the measure, the valuation date, the valuer and the contest in Ecuador (a cadastral ceiling and an announcement freeze), Bolivia (an 1879 reglamento; market value on the agrarian track), Paraguay (expropriation by individual statute), Uruguay (value immediately before the taking, and a before-and-after valuation for street openings) and Guyana (market value at the gazetting of the public-work declaration, and the eighty percent advance payment introduced by Act No. 19 of 2024). Uruguay's Supreme Court set aside a court-appointed expert's untestable report and refused to average it with the authority's. Peru's Constitutional Tribunal held a nominalist update of the agrarian bonds confiscatory and upheld expropriation authorizations made by emergency decree. Chile's Supreme Court rejected listings as comparables, treated zoning as determinative of value, and separated inflation adjustment from interest. Shorter entries cover property tax, forced-sale floors, valuer liability, succession, joint-venture valuation and private damages to real property.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22901943
Primary Topic
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recent South American Court Cases: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay

William Bert Craytor
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
article

Recent South American Court Cases: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay

William Bert Craytor
article en

Abstract

Repaginated 7 October 2026: content unchanged. Pages 409-441 of Vol. 1 No. 2 (formerly 393-425). Repaginated 5 October 2026: content unchanged; pages 393-425 of Vol. 1 No. 2 (formerly 389-421), following the version 1.1.0 corrections to the Foundations entries 000 and 007–010.This installment surveys ten South American jurisdictions: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay, with a coverage note on Suriname and French Guiana. Most of the material is expropriation. Brazil's Supreme Federal Tribunal is to decide whether possession without registered title is compensable, and has held that the difference between deposit and final award is paid through the precatório queue. Colombia's Constitutional Court treats the commercial appraisal as an input to compensation, not the compensation itself. Argentina's Ley 21.499 confines the indemnity to objective value; a Río Negro court ran interest from dispossession. Baseline studies state the measure, the valuation date, the valuer and the contest in Ecuador (a cadastral ceiling and an announcement freeze), Bolivia (an 1879 reglamento; market value on the agrarian track), Paraguay (expropriation by individual statute), Uruguay (value immediately before the taking, and a before-and-after valuation for street openings) and Guyana (market value at the gazetting of the public-work declaration, and the eighty percent advance payment introduced by Act No. 19 of 2024). Uruguay's Supreme Court set aside a court-appointed expert's untestable report and refused to average it with the authority's. Peru's Constitutional Tribunal held a nominalist update of the agrarian bonds confiscatory and upheld expropriation authorizations made by emergency decree. Chile's Supreme Court rejected listings as comparables, treated zoning as determinative of value, and separated inflation adjustment from interest. Shorter entries cover property tax, forced-sale floors, valuer liability, succession, joint-venture valuation and private damages to real property.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Recent South American Court Cases: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay — William Bert Craytor · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS