Establishing Stakeholder Priorities for Development of a Multi‐Arm Multi‐Stage Platform Trial in Crohn's Disease

ABSTRACT Background and Aims The expanding range of advanced therapies for Crohn's disease (CD) has increased complexity in treatment selection, particularly in refractory disease. Conventional randomised controlled trials are limited in evaluating multiple treatment strategies efficiently. We aimed to establish stakeholder consensus regarding the key clinical priorities required to inform subsequent development of a multi‐arm multi‐stage adaptive platform trial for Crohn's disease. Methods A two‐stage modified Delphi process was conducted with international stakeholders, including clinicians, trialists, allied health professionals and patients with CD. Delphi 1 identified priority populations, interventions and comparators; Delphi 2 focused on outcomes. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 70% agreement. Results A total of 112 participants were included in Delphi 1 and 240 in Delphi 2. Patients with exposure to ≥ 2 advanced therapy classes were prioritised as the target population (83%). Multiple advanced therapies across mechanistic classes were selected, with support for inclusion of dual advanced therapy strategies (82%). Standard‐of‐care comparator strategies reflecting real‐world practice were endorsed (83%). Clinical remission was identified as the preferred primary outcome (100%), with support for composite endpoints including endoscopic response at 48 weeks (70%). Objective measures, including endoscopy, imaging and biomarkers, were prioritised, alongside central reading and standardised assessment timepoints. Conclusions This study established stakeholder consensus on key priorities relating to population selection, interventions, comparator strategies and outcome measures to inform development of a future multi‐arm multi‐stage adaptive platform trial in Crohn's disease. These findings provide an evidence‐informed foundation for subsequent protocol development rather than defining the final trial architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCC Plus
Published
2026-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc5.70091
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing Stakeholder Priorities for Development of a Multi‐Arm Multi‐Stage Platform Trial in Crohn's Disease

Remo Panaccione, Daniel Lightowler, Peter Irving, Shahida Din et al.
JCC Plus
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Establishing Stakeholder Priorities for Development of a Multi‐Arm Multi‐Stage Platform Trial in Crohn's Disease

Remo Panaccione, Daniel Lightowler, Peter Irving, Shahida Din, Klaartje Bel Kok, Shellie Jean Radford, Gordon W Moran, Bruce Sands, Nurulamin Noor, Jonathan Segal, Stuart Taylor, Rachel Cooney, James Lindsay, Charles Maxwell-Armstrong, Shaji Sebastian, Patricia Kelly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims The expanding range of advanced therapies for Crohn's disease (CD) has increased complexity in treatment selection, particularly in refractory disease. Conventional randomised controlled trials are limited in evaluating multiple treatment strategies efficiently. We aimed to establish stakeholder consensus regarding the key clinical priorities required to inform subsequent development of a multi‐arm multi‐stage adaptive platform trial for Crohn's disease. Methods A two‐stage modified Delphi process was conducted with international stakeholders, including clinicians, trialists, allied health professionals and patients with CD. Delphi 1 identified priority populations, interventions and comparators; Delphi 2 focused on outcomes. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 70% agreement. Results A total of 112 participants were included in Delphi 1 and 240 in Delphi 2. Patients with exposure to ≥ 2 advanced therapy classes were prioritised as the target population (83%). Multiple advanced therapies across mechanistic classes were selected, with support for inclusion of dual advanced therapy strategies (82%). Standard‐of‐care comparator strategies reflecting real‐world practice were endorsed (83%). Clinical remission was identified as the preferred primary outcome (100%), with support for composite endpoints including endoscopic response at 48 weeks (70%). Objective measures, including endoscopy, imaging and biomarkers, were prioritised, alongside central reading and standardised assessment timepoints. Conclusions This study established stakeholder consensus on key priorities relating to population selection, interventions, comparator strategies and outcome measures to inform development of a future multi‐arm multi‐stage adaptive platform trial in Crohn's disease. These findings provide an evidence‐informed foundation for subsequent protocol development rather than defining the final trial architecture.

JCC PlusVol. 1(6)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Calgary (CA), The University of Western Australia (AU), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Western General Hospital (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College Birmingham (GB), Bridge University (SS), Thomas Foundation (AU), The London College (GB), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Crohn's and Colitis UK (GB), Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.