Reframing Error in Reduced-Crew Flightdecks: Implications for AI-Supported Single-Pilot Operations

Potential single-pilot operations for large aircraft increases the ability of commercial aviation to respond to challenges regarding pilot shortages, rising operational costs, and the need to maintain a safe flight environment. Introducing AI in the flightdeck in a pilot support role holds promise to achieve this goal. A concern with this configuration would be changes in error accountability based on the shift from two pilots to one: the single pilot would now have sole authority of the aircraft and be responsible for any errors or mistakes that occur despite the AI independently completing tasks. This paper examined AI-supported single-pilot operations through Hollnagel’s Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives to compare how errors could vary in interpretation and concluded that Safety-I was useful for identifying adverse outcomes, but a Safety-II approach is essential for capturing how to improve the actual system. Based on this, AI-supported SPO development suggestions are provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261493618
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Reframing Error in Reduced-Crew Flightdecks: Implications for AI-Supported Single-Pilot Operations

Zoe Spanos, Joseph Roland Keebler, Elizabeth R. Merwin, Eva Lobaton
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Reframing Error in Reduced-Crew Flightdecks: Implications for AI-Supported Single-Pilot Operations

Zoe Spanos, Joseph Roland Keebler, Elizabeth R. Merwin, Eva Lobaton
article en

Abstract

Potential single-pilot operations for large aircraft increases the ability of commercial aviation to respond to challenges regarding pilot shortages, rising operational costs, and the need to maintain a safe flight environment. Introducing AI in the flightdeck in a pilot support role holds promise to achieve this goal. A concern with this configuration would be changes in error accountability based on the shift from two pilots to one: the single pilot would now have sole authority of the aircraft and be responsible for any errors or mistakes that occur despite the AI independently completing tasks. This paper examined AI-supported single-pilot operations through Hollnagel’s Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives to compare how errors could vary in interpretation and concluded that Safety-I was useful for identifying adverse outcomes, but a Safety-II approach is essential for capturing how to improve the actual system. Based on this, AI-supported SPO development suggestions are provided.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reframing Error in Reduced-Crew Flightdecks: Implications for AI-Supported Single-Pilot Operations — Zoe Spanos, Joseph Roland Keebler, et al. · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS