Relations among cognitive effort, physical effort, and delay discounting

The immediacy of a consequence and the effort required to achieve it are two key factors that influence decision making. In the current study, 170 participants completed two computer tasks to earn points. Both tasks arranged a Fixed-Interval 24-s schedule for a larger number of points, but participants could defect to a smaller immediate reward after various delays on most trials. One task required physical effort (precise clicking with the mouse), the other assessed cognitive effort (simple mathematical problems). Two levels of response difficulty were arranged in each task. There were significant effects of delay and effort for both tasks. Participants chose the larger later reward more often when the opportunity to defect was more delayed and when response effort was lower. There was no significant correlation between individuals’ reinforcer discounting due to delay and due to response effort. There were, however, significant correlations between individuals’ discounting of physical and cognitive effort suggesting effort discounting is more trait-like. The combination of delay and effort should be considered in designing tasks for educational or workplace settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Motivation
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2026.102364
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Relations among cognitive effort, physical effort, and delay discounting

Hamish Church, Brent Alsop
Learning and Motivation
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Relations among cognitive effort, physical effort, and delay discounting

Hamish Church, Brent Alsop
article en

Abstract

The immediacy of a consequence and the effort required to achieve it are two key factors that influence decision making. In the current study, 170 participants completed two computer tasks to earn points. Both tasks arranged a Fixed-Interval 24-s schedule for a larger number of points, but participants could defect to a smaller immediate reward after various delays on most trials. One task required physical effort (precise clicking with the mouse), the other assessed cognitive effort (simple mathematical problems). Two levels of response difficulty were arranged in each task. There were significant effects of delay and effort for both tasks. Participants chose the larger later reward more often when the opportunity to defect was more delayed and when response effort was lower. There was no significant correlation between individuals’ reinforcer discounting due to delay and due to response effort. There were, however, significant correlations between individuals’ discounting of physical and cognitive effort suggesting effort discounting is more trait-like. The combination of delay and effort should be considered in designing tasks for educational or workplace settings.

Learning and MotivationVol. 96
University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.