Identification of Activity Breaks Using Accelerometry

Laboratory studies show that performing ~2 min of activity every 20–30 min, known as activity breaks, is associated with improved cardiometabolic health outcomes. However, objectively identifying these activity breaks in a free-living setting remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate an algorithm to detect activity breaks using accelerometer data. Thirty-one healthy adults (mean (SD) age 33 (12) y, 71% female) wore three accelerometers (ActiGraphs on the wrist and hip; ActivPAL on the thigh) while completing eight activity breaks, approximately 30 min apart. Participants self-recorded activity break start and stop times. Lasso regression with an ‘activity break’ definition was used to develop an algorithm that used all three accelerometers and for each accelerometer individually, using two-thirds of participant data for development and the remaining third for testing. External validation was undertaken using an independent dataset. For the three-device algorithm, the mean difference between predicted and reported activity breaks was 0.0 (95% CI: −1.7, 1.7), while predicted break duration was, on average, 0.9 min longer than the reported duration (95% CI: 0.2, 1.6). These findings suggest the algorithm accurately estimates the frequency and duration of activity breaks and may be useful for quantifying this behaviour in free-living studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26196194
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Identification of Activity Breaks Using Accelerometry

Jennifer T. Gale, Meredith C. Peddie, Hannah Tamblyn, Jillan Haszard
Sensors
Physical Activity and Health
article

Identification of Activity Breaks Using Accelerometry

Jennifer T. Gale, Meredith C. Peddie, Hannah Tamblyn, Jillan Haszard
article en

Abstract

Laboratory studies show that performing ~2 min of activity every 20–30 min, known as activity breaks, is associated with improved cardiometabolic health outcomes. However, objectively identifying these activity breaks in a free-living setting remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate an algorithm to detect activity breaks using accelerometer data. Thirty-one healthy adults (mean (SD) age 33 (12) y, 71% female) wore three accelerometers (ActiGraphs on the wrist and hip; ActivPAL on the thigh) while completing eight activity breaks, approximately 30 min apart. Participants self-recorded activity break start and stop times. Lasso regression with an ‘activity break’ definition was used to develop an algorithm that used all three accelerometers and for each accelerometer individually, using two-thirds of participant data for development and the remaining third for testing. External validation was undertaken using an independent dataset. For the three-device algorithm, the mean difference between predicted and reported activity breaks was 0.0 (95% CI: −1.7, 1.7), while predicted break duration was, on average, 0.9 min longer than the reported duration (95% CI: 0.2, 1.6). These findings suggest the algorithm accurately estimates the frequency and duration of activity breaks and may be useful for quantifying this behaviour in free-living studies.

SensorsVol. 26(19)
University of Auckland (NZ), Dunedin Public Hospital (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identification of Activity Breaks Using Accelerometry — Jennifer T. Gale, Meredith C. Peddie, et al. · Sensors (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS