Development of consensus guidelines for classification of emergent neonatal transports using a Delphi process

BACKGROUND: The transport of neonates to tertiary and quaternary neonatal intensive care units occurs frequently in North America, particularly for neonates requiring emergent intervention. The timely stabilization and transfer of a critically ill neonate requiring higher level of care is imperative for optimal clinical outcomes. There is no consensus on the definition of "emergent" related to dispatch of a transport team. However, some utilize a time frame of 30 minutes from referral center request based on illness severity and/or risk. Current definitions of illness severity and/or risk are institution-specific, lacking standardization. The development of consensus-driven guidelines for emergent neonatal transport criteria will provide a framework adaptable across diverse healthcare settings to standardize decision making, resulting in comparable data and outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project is to develop expert consensus criteria for neonatal emergent interfacility transport. DESIGN/METHODS: Following review of available literature and institution-specific guidelines and policies, a subset of neonatologists within the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC) Transport Focus Group compiled a proposed list of emergent neonatal criteria. These criteria were divided into three categories: (1) diagnosis, (2) clinical sign, or (3) specialized equipment and/or resources required. Using the Delphi process, CHNC transport leaders voted in two rounds for consensus. RESULTS: Round 1 of surveys received responses from 31 of 49 (63%) CHNC sites and achieved 100% agreement on criteria, defined as >80% consensus of each criterion. Revisions and additions suggested by participants in Round 1 were incorporated into the Round 2 survey. Round 2 of surveys received responses from 40 of 49 (82%) CHNC sites and again received 100% agreement on criteria. CONCLUSION(S): All proposed conditions reached consensus for inclusion, falling into one of three major categories. Consensus-derived criteria for emergent neonatal transport will provide a standardized framework for triage, prioritization and resource utilization. Additionally, these guidelines should facilitate national and international benchmarking, improve efficiency and support neonatal outcome-based research across North America.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Perinatology
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-026-02900-w
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of consensus guidelines for classification of emergent neonatal transports using a Delphi process

Luke T. Viehl, Elisabeth Anson, Kyong‐Soon Lee, Shamik Trivedi et al.
Journal of Perinatology
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Development of consensus guidelines for classification of emergent neonatal transports using a Delphi process

Luke T. Viehl, Elisabeth Anson, Kyong‐Soon Lee, Shamik Trivedi, Samuel Wong, Daniel Dirnberger, Vedanta Dariya, Rebecca Martinez-Hannon, Tetyana Nesterenko
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The transport of neonates to tertiary and quaternary neonatal intensive care units occurs frequently in North America, particularly for neonates requiring emergent intervention. The timely stabilization and transfer of a critically ill neonate requiring higher level of care is imperative for optimal clinical outcomes. There is no consensus on the definition of "emergent" related to dispatch of a transport team. However, some utilize a time frame of 30 minutes from referral center request based on illness severity and/or risk. Current definitions of illness severity and/or risk are institution-specific, lacking standardization. The development of consensus-driven guidelines for emergent neonatal transport criteria will provide a framework adaptable across diverse healthcare settings to standardize decision making, resulting in comparable data and outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project is to develop expert consensus criteria for neonatal emergent interfacility transport. DESIGN/METHODS: Following review of available literature and institution-specific guidelines and policies, a subset of neonatologists within the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium (CHNC) Transport Focus Group compiled a proposed list of emergent neonatal criteria. These criteria were divided into three categories: (1) diagnosis, (2) clinical sign, or (3) specialized equipment and/or resources required. Using the Delphi process, CHNC transport leaders voted in two rounds for consensus. RESULTS: Round 1 of surveys received responses from 31 of 49 (63%) CHNC sites and achieved 100% agreement on criteria, defined as >80% consensus of each criterion. Revisions and additions suggested by participants in Round 1 were incorporated into the Round 2 survey. Round 2 of surveys received responses from 40 of 49 (82%) CHNC sites and again received 100% agreement on criteria. CONCLUSION(S): All proposed conditions reached consensus for inclusion, falling into one of three major categories. Consensus-derived criteria for emergent neonatal transport will provide a standardized framework for triage, prioritization and resource utilization. Additionally, these guidelines should facilitate national and international benchmarking, improve efficiency and support neonatal outcome-based research across North America.

Journal of Perinatology
Northwestern University (US), University of Iowa (US), Emory University (US), George Washington University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Keck Hospital of USC (US), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Nemours Children's Clinic (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.