Embodied Carbon in Building Materials: Key Research Trends, Patterns, and Gaps

Building materials account for a significant percentage of embodied carbon (EC) across construction life cycles, making the industry a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. Studies on EC and decarbonization continue to be dispersed among disciplines, techniques, and regional settings despite increased academic interest, which limits their policy and practical usefulness, especially in developing countries. Using Scopus peer-reviewed publications from 2011 to 2025, this study provides a bibliometric analysis of EC and decarbonization in building materials using 285 studies to identify publication trends, subject areas, and top journals while keyword co-occurrence networks generated using VOSviewer software version 1.6.20 identified theme advancement and thematic evolution following PRISMA procedures. The qualitative synthesis of the assessing methodological landscape of embodied carbon analysis was conducted on nine (9) evaluated studies. Results show a sharp increase in publications after 2016, with engineering, environmental science, and energy disciplines dominating. While the growing fields include circular economy practices and data-driven decision-making, life cycle assessment, EC quantification, and decarbonization procedures are important topics. However, there are significant inconsistencies in methods and a lack of optimization-focused studies and investigations from developing countries and regions, signifying important gaps in low-carbon construction practices. Key research gaps were identified, and recommendations were provided to enhance the adoption of low-carbon materials and integrate standard carbon assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su181910005
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Embodied Carbon in Building Materials: Key Research Trends, Patterns, and Gaps

Funmilayo Caroline Jayeola, Masengo Ilunga, Belachew Asteray Demiss
Sustainability
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Embodied Carbon in Building Materials: Key Research Trends, Patterns, and Gaps

Funmilayo Caroline Jayeola, Masengo Ilunga, Belachew Asteray Demiss
article en

Abstract

Building materials account for a significant percentage of embodied carbon (EC) across construction life cycles, making the industry a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. Studies on EC and decarbonization continue to be dispersed among disciplines, techniques, and regional settings despite increased academic interest, which limits their policy and practical usefulness, especially in developing countries. Using Scopus peer-reviewed publications from 2011 to 2025, this study provides a bibliometric analysis of EC and decarbonization in building materials using 285 studies to identify publication trends, subject areas, and top journals while keyword co-occurrence networks generated using VOSviewer software version 1.6.20 identified theme advancement and thematic evolution following PRISMA procedures. The qualitative synthesis of the assessing methodological landscape of embodied carbon analysis was conducted on nine (9) evaluated studies. Results show a sharp increase in publications after 2016, with engineering, environmental science, and energy disciplines dominating. While the growing fields include circular economy practices and data-driven decision-making, life cycle assessment, EC quantification, and decarbonization procedures are important topics. However, there are significant inconsistencies in methods and a lack of optimization-focused studies and investigations from developing countries and regions, signifying important gaps in low-carbon construction practices. Key research gaps were identified, and recommendations were provided to enhance the adoption of low-carbon materials and integrate standard carbon assessment.

SustainabilityVol. 18(19)
University of South Africa (ZA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.