Insurance and Cost-Related Access Barriers to Specialty Oral Anticancer Medications for Blood Cancers in a Nationwide Sample of Medicare and Commercially Insured Patients

PURPOSE Specialty oral anticancer medications (SOAMs) improve survival across blood cancers, but access challenges persist. This study examined approval and fill rates of SOAM prescriptions indicated for blood cancers in a nationwide sample of Medicare and commercially insured patients. METHODS Using nationwide claims, we identified patients with ≥1 new SOAM prescription during 2022. Outcomes included whether a prescription for a new SOAM was (1) rejected by the insurer, (2) approved but not filled by the patient, or (3) approved and filled, at both initial presentation and within 90 days. Among rejected prescriptions, we examined rejection reasons. Among approved prescriptions, we compared fill rates across out-of-pocket (OOP) cost levels. Adjusted outcomes were estimated using logistic regressions. RESULTS The study included 12,134 patients (61.0% Medicare, 39.0% commercial) with an SOAM prescription. Initially, very few prescriptions were both approved and filled (9.6%, Medicare; 4.0%, commercial). Insurers initially rejected most prescriptions (64.9% for Medicare, 84.0% for commercial), frequently due to prior authorization or formulary restrictions. By 90 days, approval rates rose to 85.0% (Medicare) and 62.8% (commercial), but many approved prescriptions were never filled; ultimately, only 54.5% of Medicare patients and 45.5% of commercial patients both received insurer approval and filled their prescription. Fill rates dropped sharply when OOP costs exceeded $175 in US dollars (USD), with the lowest rates observed at OOP costs of $500.01–$2,000 USD for Medicare patients (29.2%) and at ≥$2,000 USD for commercially insured patients (21.6%). Adjusted rates were similar to unadjusted rates. CONCLUSION This study found substantial access barriers to SOAMs, particularly among commercially insured patients. Even after insurer approval, many patients never filled their prescription. This highlights the importance of addressing both payer-level restrictions and patient-level affordability challenges to ensure treatment access.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-26-00247
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Insurance and Cost-Related Access Barriers to Specialty Oral Anticancer Medications for Blood Cancers in a Nationwide Sample of Medicare and Commercially Insured Patients

Zhi Geng, Amy R. Pettit, Scott F. Huntington, John Kent Lin et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Insurance and Cost-Related Access Barriers to Specialty Oral Anticancer Medications for Blood Cancers in a Nationwide Sample of Medicare and Commercially Insured Patients

Zhi Geng, Amy R. Pettit, Scott F. Huntington, John Kent Lin, Matthew J. Klebanoff, Katrina Armstrong, Jalpa A. Doshi, Pengxiang Li
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE Specialty oral anticancer medications (SOAMs) improve survival across blood cancers, but access challenges persist. This study examined approval and fill rates of SOAM prescriptions indicated for blood cancers in a nationwide sample of Medicare and commercially insured patients. METHODS Using nationwide claims, we identified patients with ≥1 new SOAM prescription during 2022. Outcomes included whether a prescription for a new SOAM was (1) rejected by the insurer, (2) approved but not filled by the patient, or (3) approved and filled, at both initial presentation and within 90 days. Among rejected prescriptions, we examined rejection reasons. Among approved prescriptions, we compared fill rates across out-of-pocket (OOP) cost levels. Adjusted outcomes were estimated using logistic regressions. RESULTS The study included 12,134 patients (61.0% Medicare, 39.0% commercial) with an SOAM prescription. Initially, very few prescriptions were both approved and filled (9.6%, Medicare; 4.0%, commercial). Insurers initially rejected most prescriptions (64.9% for Medicare, 84.0% for commercial), frequently due to prior authorization or formulary restrictions. By 90 days, approval rates rose to 85.0% (Medicare) and 62.8% (commercial), but many approved prescriptions were never filled; ultimately, only 54.5% of Medicare patients and 45.5% of commercial patients both received insurer approval and filled their prescription. Fill rates dropped sharply when OOP costs exceeded $175 in US dollars (USD), with the lowest rates observed at OOP costs of $500.01–$2,000 USD for Medicare patients (29.2%) and at ≥$2,000 USD for commercially insured patients (21.6%). Adjusted rates were similar to unadjusted rates. CONCLUSION This study found substantial access barriers to SOAMs, particularly among commercially insured patients. Even after insurer approval, many patients never filled their prescription. This highlights the importance of addressing both payer-level restrictions and patient-level affordability challenges to ensure treatment access.

Journal of Clinical Oncology
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Yale University (US), Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US), Columbia University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.