Breast cancer immunogenicity as a spectrum: evolving concepts and therapeutic implications

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape for many cancers, but its application in solid tumors has lagged. There is now evidence that immunotherapy can improve outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer, but hormone receptor–positive (HR + ) breast cancer has traditionally been considered immunologically cold. However, emerging evidence challenges this binary paradigm, suggesting that a biologically relevant subset of HR + /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2 – ) tumors exhibit meaningful immunogenic features and clinically relevant sensitivity to immune-based treatment. In this Review we summarize the current understanding of immunogenicity and clinical use of immune-based treatments across breast cancer subtypes. We argue for a broader view of a spectrum of breast cancer immunogenicity and highlight the importance of host factors, including parity and lactation history, in shaping antitumor immunity. Improved identification of immunologically active subsets and deeper mechanistic insight will be essential to expand the therapeutic benefit of immunotherapy to broader patient cohorts and to refine care of patients with breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1172/jci207634
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Breast cancer immunogenicity as a spectrum: evolving concepts and therapeutic implications

Sherene Loi, Michael A. Harris, Courtney T. van Geelen, Julia R Dixon-Douglas et al.
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Breast cancer immunogenicity as a spectrum: evolving concepts and therapeutic implications

Sherene Loi, Michael A. Harris, Courtney T. van Geelen, Julia R Dixon-Douglas, Jasmine Kay
article en

Abstract

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape for many cancers, but its application in solid tumors has lagged. There is now evidence that immunotherapy can improve outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer, but hormone receptor–positive (HR + ) breast cancer has traditionally been considered immunologically cold. However, emerging evidence challenges this binary paradigm, suggesting that a biologically relevant subset of HR + /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2 – ) tumors exhibit meaningful immunogenic features and clinically relevant sensitivity to immune-based treatment. In this Review we summarize the current understanding of immunogenicity and clinical use of immune-based treatments across breast cancer subtypes. We argue for a broader view of a spectrum of breast cancer immunogenicity and highlight the importance of host factors, including parity and lactation history, in shaping antitumor immunity. Improved identification of immunologically active subsets and deeper mechanistic insight will be essential to expand the therapeutic benefit of immunotherapy to broader patient cohorts and to refine care of patients with breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical InvestigationVol. 136(19)
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.