Modeling positive and negative attitudes toward artificial intelligence among physiotherapy students: The role of literacy, anxiety, beliefs, and emotions

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare and physiotherapy education; however, evidence regarding physiotherapy students’ attitudes toward AI and the factors related of positive and negative attitudes remains limited. Objective This study aimed to identify factors associated with physiotherapy students’ positive and negative attitudes toward AI. Method: This cross-sectional study surveyed 196 physiotherapy students from three universities to examine factors influencing their attitudes toward AI. Participants completed the General Attitudes toward AI Scale, AI Literacy Scale, AI Anxiety Scale, and additional measures of perceptions and beliefs related to AI. Results Regression analyses indicated that higher AI literacy, excitement toward AI, perceived reliability of AI applications, and belief in curriculum integration were associated with positive attitudes (R 2 = 22.4%). Higher AI anxiety was associated with stronger negative attitudes, whereas curiosity was associated with fewer negative attitudes (R 2 = 25.9%). Demographic variables were not significantly associated with either outcome. Conclusion Emotional factors, AI literacy, and educational beliefs appear to be related to physiotherapy students’ attitudes toward AI. These findings suggest the need for educational strategies that may help reduce AI-related anxiety and support informed engagement with AI in physiotherapy education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815261492327
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modeling positive and negative attitudes toward artificial intelligence among physiotherapy students: The role of literacy, anxiety, beliefs, and emotions

Berivan Beril KILIÇ, Özden YAŞARER, Emel Mete, Reyhan Kaygusuz Benli
Work
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Modeling positive and negative attitudes toward artificial intelligence among physiotherapy students: The role of literacy, anxiety, beliefs, and emotions

Berivan Beril KILIÇ, Özden YAŞARER, Emel Mete, Reyhan Kaygusuz Benli
article en

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare and physiotherapy education; however, evidence regarding physiotherapy students’ attitudes toward AI and the factors related of positive and negative attitudes remains limited. Objective This study aimed to identify factors associated with physiotherapy students’ positive and negative attitudes toward AI. Method: This cross-sectional study surveyed 196 physiotherapy students from three universities to examine factors influencing their attitudes toward AI. Participants completed the General Attitudes toward AI Scale, AI Literacy Scale, AI Anxiety Scale, and additional measures of perceptions and beliefs related to AI. Results Regression analyses indicated that higher AI literacy, excitement toward AI, perceived reliability of AI applications, and belief in curriculum integration were associated with positive attitudes (R 2 = 22.4%). Higher AI anxiety was associated with stronger negative attitudes, whereas curiosity was associated with fewer negative attitudes (R 2 = 25.9%). Demographic variables were not significantly associated with either outcome. Conclusion Emotional factors, AI literacy, and educational beliefs appear to be related to physiotherapy students’ attitudes toward AI. These findings suggest the need for educational strategies that may help reduce AI-related anxiety and support informed engagement with AI in physiotherapy education.

Work
Biruni University (TR), Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.