Sensitivity and specificity of tuberculosis screening tools in people with diabetes

Systematic screening for tuberculosis (TB) is recommended in people with diabetes; however, data on the accuracy of screening tools in this population are lacking. We assessed the accuracy of symptom and chest X-ray screening among people with diabetes. We consecutively enrolled adults with diabetes attending routine care in South Africa. All participants underwent symptom screening and chest X-ray. A single sputum specimen was collected from all participants and tested by Xpert Ultra. A positive Xpert Ultra result was used as the reference standard. We enrolled 673 participants. The median age was 54 years (interquartile range 47–60 years), and 63.8% were female. HIV prevalence was 17.2%. Prevalent TB was diagnosed in nine participants (1.33%). Any cough had a sensitivity of 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-60.0%) and a specificity of 97.5% (95%CI 96.0-98.6%). Expanding the symptom definition to include any of cough, fever, weight loss, or night sweats did not improve sensitivity (22.2%, 95% CI 2.1–60.0) and slightly reduced specificity to 96.0% (95% CI 94.2–97.0). Chest X-ray abnormalities suggestive of TB demonstrated a sensitivity of 55.6% (95%CI 21.2-86.3%) and a specificity of 95.4% (95%CI 93.4-97.0%). The specificity of chest X-ray was significantly lower in participants with prior TB (87.6%, 95% CI: 79.8–90.6%), compared to 97.2% (95% CI: 95.2–98.5%) in those without (p < 0.01). Symptom-based TB screening has poor sensitivity in people with diabetes. Although chest X-ray improved the sensitivity, it remained suboptimal, with a reduced specificity in people with previous TB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006479
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Sensitivity and specificity of tuberculosis screening tools in people with diabetes

Robert John Wilkinson, Trinh Duong, Lillian Twentiey, Molebogeng Xheedha Rangaka et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Sensitivity and specificity of tuberculosis screening tools in people with diabetes

Robert John Wilkinson, Trinh Duong, Lillian Twentiey, Molebogeng Xheedha Rangaka, Rene T. Goliath, Yohhei Hamada, Louise Lai Sai, Arshad Taliep, Nashreen Omar-Davies, Neha Janrode, Walter Chabaya, Amanda Jackson, Lauren Barron, Shireen Galant
article en

Abstract

Systematic screening for tuberculosis (TB) is recommended in people with diabetes; however, data on the accuracy of screening tools in this population are lacking. We assessed the accuracy of symptom and chest X-ray screening among people with diabetes. We consecutively enrolled adults with diabetes attending routine care in South Africa. All participants underwent symptom screening and chest X-ray. A single sputum specimen was collected from all participants and tested by Xpert Ultra. A positive Xpert Ultra result was used as the reference standard. We enrolled 673 participants. The median age was 54 years (interquartile range 47–60 years), and 63.8% were female. HIV prevalence was 17.2%. Prevalent TB was diagnosed in nine participants (1.33%). Any cough had a sensitivity of 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-60.0%) and a specificity of 97.5% (95%CI 96.0-98.6%). Expanding the symptom definition to include any of cough, fever, weight loss, or night sweats did not improve sensitivity (22.2%, 95% CI 2.1–60.0) and slightly reduced specificity to 96.0% (95% CI 94.2–97.0). Chest X-ray abnormalities suggestive of TB demonstrated a sensitivity of 55.6% (95%CI 21.2-86.3%) and a specificity of 95.4% (95%CI 93.4-97.0%). The specificity of chest X-ray was significantly lower in participants with prior TB (87.6%, 95% CI: 79.8–90.6%), compared to 97.2% (95% CI: 95.2–98.5%) in those without (p < 0.01). Symptom-based TB screening has poor sensitivity in people with diabetes. Although chest X-ray improved the sensitivity, it remained suboptimal, with a reduced specificity in people with previous TB.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(9)
University of Cape Town (ZA), The Francis Crick Institute (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.