Integrated Numerical Assessment of Canal Embankment Stability and Buried Gas Pipeline Integrity

Buried gas pipelines crossing irrigation canals are critical infrastructure that may be affected by canal rehabilitation, embankment instability, ground deformation, and fluctuating hydraulic conditions. This study presents a sequential numerical assessment framework integrating slope stability, ground deformation, soil–pipeline interaction, and hydraulic erosion analysis for an existing buried gas pipeline beneath the Rapeephat Canal in Thailand, which was recently widened to increase irrigation capacity. Two- and three-dimensional finite element analyses were conducted under three hydraulic conditions: maximum water level, minimum water level, and rapid drawdown. The existing embankment exhibited inadequate stability, with factors of safety ranging from 0.51 to 1.42. Following stabilization with a concrete face slab, the factors of safety increased to between 1.50 and 1.73, exceeding the adopted criterion of 1.50 under the investigated conditions. The maximum calculated ground settlement was 13.58 mm, while the maximum pipeline displacement under the normal operating pressure of 4.52 MPa was 10.10 mm. The maximum PLAXIS-derived bending stress was 0.088 MPa, whereas a supplementary hoop-plus-bending stress check indicated an equivalent combined stress range of approximately 116–145 MPa under the normal operating pressure, remaining below the adopted stress criterion based on 90% of the specified minimum yield strength. The maximum calculated boundary shear stress was 6.41 N/m2, below the adopted permissible value of approximately 12 N/m2 for stiff clay. The results demonstrate the influence of canal modification and hydraulic conditions on embankment stability, ground deformation, and pipeline response. The framework provides a practical approach for assessing existing pipeline–canal crossings, while the results should be interpreted within the adopted modeling assumptions and the limitations of the available field data and sequential coupling approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11100347
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Integrated Numerical Assessment of Canal Embankment Stability and Buried Gas Pipeline Integrity

Supakij Nontananandh, Sutasinee Intui, Shinya Inazumi, Noppanut Kosinanondh et al.
Infrastructures
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Integrated Numerical Assessment of Canal Embankment Stability and Buried Gas Pipeline Integrity

Supakij Nontananandh, Sutasinee Intui, Shinya Inazumi, Noppanut Kosinanondh, Siwawoot Papattapong
article en

Abstract

Buried gas pipelines crossing irrigation canals are critical infrastructure that may be affected by canal rehabilitation, embankment instability, ground deformation, and fluctuating hydraulic conditions. This study presents a sequential numerical assessment framework integrating slope stability, ground deformation, soil–pipeline interaction, and hydraulic erosion analysis for an existing buried gas pipeline beneath the Rapeephat Canal in Thailand, which was recently widened to increase irrigation capacity. Two- and three-dimensional finite element analyses were conducted under three hydraulic conditions: maximum water level, minimum water level, and rapid drawdown. The existing embankment exhibited inadequate stability, with factors of safety ranging from 0.51 to 1.42. Following stabilization with a concrete face slab, the factors of safety increased to between 1.50 and 1.73, exceeding the adopted criterion of 1.50 under the investigated conditions. The maximum calculated ground settlement was 13.58 mm, while the maximum pipeline displacement under the normal operating pressure of 4.52 MPa was 10.10 mm. The maximum PLAXIS-derived bending stress was 0.088 MPa, whereas a supplementary hoop-plus-bending stress check indicated an equivalent combined stress range of approximately 116–145 MPa under the normal operating pressure, remaining below the adopted stress criterion based on 90% of the specified minimum yield strength. The maximum calculated boundary shear stress was 6.41 N/m2, below the adopted permissible value of approximately 12 N/m2 for stiff clay. The results demonstrate the influence of canal modification and hydraulic conditions on embankment stability, ground deformation, and pipeline response. The framework provides a practical approach for assessing existing pipeline–canal crossings, while the results should be interpreted within the adopted modeling assumptions and the limitations of the available field data and sequential coupling approach.

InfrastructuresVol. 11(10)
PTT Public Company Limited (Thailand) (TH), Shibaura Institute of Technology (JP), Kasetsart University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.