Access, institutional context, and outpatient satisfaction among adults with chronic conditions in İstanbul: a cross-sectional study

Patient satisfaction in chronic disease care reflects clinical encounters as well as the conditions under which healthcare services are accessed and organized. This study examined associations between access-related conditions and patient satisfaction among adults living with chronic conditions in İstanbul, Türkiye. This analytical cross-sectional study included 608 adults aged 18 years and older who reported at least one chronic condition and experience of receiving follow-up or treatment from a healthcare institution. Data were collected online between January 1, 2026 and March 15, 2026 using a self-administered structured questionnaire including sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare access indicators, and the Turkish 18-item patient satisfaction scale. Satisfaction was analyzed as an overall score and across administrative, physician-related, and service/environment-related domains. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, complete-case robust multivariable regression with HC3 standard errors, multiple-imputation sensitivity analysis, and cluster analysis were performed. The mean overall satisfaction score was 3.43 ± 0.66. Physician-related satisfaction had the highest mean (3.61 ± 0.75), whereas service/environment-related satisfaction had the lowest (3.24 ± 0.72). The overall scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.95), and exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure (KMO = 0.946; Bartlett’s test, p < 0.001). In the primary complete-case overall model ( n = 445), higher appointment waiting category was associated with lower satisfaction (B = −0.09, SE = 0.04, p = 0.014). Private-hospital use was associated with higher satisfaction than state-hospital use (B = 0.19, SE = 0.08, p = 0.013), whereas public transport was associated with lower satisfaction than private-vehicle use (B = −0.21, SE = 0.07, p = 0.004). Longer travel time was inversely associated with satisfaction (B = −0.13, SE = 0.07, p = 0.048), while log-transformed distance showed a positive conditional association (B = 0.16, SE = 0.06, p = 0.011). Three satisfaction profiles were identified. Patient satisfaction among adults with chronic conditions was associated with both interpersonal care and the organizational experience of accessing services. Appointment waiting, transport conditions, travel burden, and institutional context differentiated outpatient experience, while physician-related evaluations remained comparatively favorable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15689-3
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Access, institutional context, and outpatient satisfaction among adults with chronic conditions in İstanbul: a cross-sectional study

Kadriye Sönmez
BMC Health Services Research
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Access, institutional context, and outpatient satisfaction among adults with chronic conditions in İstanbul: a cross-sectional study

Kadriye Sönmez
article en

Abstract

Patient satisfaction in chronic disease care reflects clinical encounters as well as the conditions under which healthcare services are accessed and organized. This study examined associations between access-related conditions and patient satisfaction among adults living with chronic conditions in İstanbul, Türkiye. This analytical cross-sectional study included 608 adults aged 18 years and older who reported at least one chronic condition and experience of receiving follow-up or treatment from a healthcare institution. Data were collected online between January 1, 2026 and March 15, 2026 using a self-administered structured questionnaire including sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare access indicators, and the Turkish 18-item patient satisfaction scale. Satisfaction was analyzed as an overall score and across administrative, physician-related, and service/environment-related domains. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, complete-case robust multivariable regression with HC3 standard errors, multiple-imputation sensitivity analysis, and cluster analysis were performed. The mean overall satisfaction score was 3.43 ± 0.66. Physician-related satisfaction had the highest mean (3.61 ± 0.75), whereas service/environment-related satisfaction had the lowest (3.24 ± 0.72). The overall scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.95), and exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure (KMO = 0.946; Bartlett’s test, p < 0.001). In the primary complete-case overall model ( n = 445), higher appointment waiting category was associated with lower satisfaction (B = −0.09, SE = 0.04, p = 0.014). Private-hospital use was associated with higher satisfaction than state-hospital use (B = 0.19, SE = 0.08, p = 0.013), whereas public transport was associated with lower satisfaction than private-vehicle use (B = −0.21, SE = 0.07, p = 0.004). Longer travel time was inversely associated with satisfaction (B = −0.13, SE = 0.07, p = 0.048), while log-transformed distance showed a positive conditional association (B = 0.16, SE = 0.06, p = 0.011). Three satisfaction profiles were identified. Patient satisfaction among adults with chronic conditions was associated with both interpersonal care and the organizational experience of accessing services. Appointment waiting, transport conditions, travel burden, and institutional context differentiated outpatient experience, while physician-related evaluations remained comparatively favorable.

BMC Health Services Research
Istanbul Topkapi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.