Factors Predicting Pre‐Service Teachers' Intentions to Use Artificial Intelligence Software

ABSTRACT This research investigates the factors affecting pre‐service teachers' (PSTs) behavioural intentions (BI) to use artificial intelligence software in their future classes. The study examined factors affecting PSTs' behavioural intentions using an extended UTAUT framework comprising Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), and Hedonic Motivation (HM). The study included 432 PSTs from the Faculty of Education at a state university in Eastern Türkiye. “Pre‐service Teachers' Acceptance Scale for AI‐Supported Education”, a valid and reliable scale, was used for data collection. The data were analysed using multiple linear regression. The results revealed that PE, SI, and HM were significant predictors of PSTs' BI, whereas EE and FC were not significant predictors. Besides, the research revealed that the independent variables explained 67% of the variance in PSTs' BI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Education
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70889
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Factors Predicting Pre‐Service Teachers' Intentions to Use Artificial Intelligence Software

Süleyman Nihat Şad, Kübra AÇIKGÜL, Büşra ÇELİK
European Journal of Education
AI in Service Interactions
article

Factors Predicting Pre‐Service Teachers' Intentions to Use Artificial Intelligence Software

Süleyman Nihat Şad, Kübra AÇIKGÜL, Büşra ÇELİK
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research investigates the factors affecting pre‐service teachers' (PSTs) behavioural intentions (BI) to use artificial intelligence software in their future classes. The study examined factors affecting PSTs' behavioural intentions using an extended UTAUT framework comprising Performance Expectancy (PE), Effort Expectancy (EE), Social Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), and Hedonic Motivation (HM). The study included 432 PSTs from the Faculty of Education at a state university in Eastern Türkiye. “Pre‐service Teachers' Acceptance Scale for AI‐Supported Education”, a valid and reliable scale, was used for data collection. The data were analysed using multiple linear regression. The results revealed that PE, SI, and HM were significant predictors of PSTs' BI, whereas EE and FC were not significant predictors. Besides, the research revealed that the independent variables explained 67% of the variance in PSTs' BI.

European Journal of EducationVol. 61(4)
Inonu University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Factors Predicting Pre‐Service Teachers' Intentions to Use Artificial Intelligence Software — Süleyman Nihat Şad, Kübra AÇIKGÜL, et al. · European Journal of Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS