Environmental Performance of Temporary Reusable Membrane Structures: A Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract Temporary membrane structures are widely used for short‐term events, seasonal enclosures, and reusable architectural applications. Despite their growing relevance within circular construction, their environmental performance remains insufficiently quantified, particularly when multiple installations, storage, transportation, and operational energy are considered. This paper evaluates their environmental performance through Life Cycle Assessment according to EN 15804, focusing on Global Warming Potential. Four case studies are analysed: a lightweight modular rental tent (ADD‐ON), an air‐supported tennis dome (TCI Illertissen), an easy‐to‐erect shelter (Fastival) and an ultra‐lightweight canopy (TemporActive). Results demonstrate that reuse strongly reduces Global Warming Potential per square meter per service life, while transportation and operational energy become dominant contributors as installation cycles increase. In addition, foundations and/or ballast systems increase the overall structure weight, thereby amplifying transport‐related emissions. The findings highlight the importance of designing for reuse, minimising transport distances, optimising anchorage solutions, and reducing operational energy demand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ce/papers
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.71034
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Environmental Performance of Temporary Reusable Membrane Structures: A Life Cycle Assessment

Lincy Pyl, Carol Monticelli, Lars De Laêt, Marijke Mollaert et al.
ce/papers
Structural Analysis and Optimization
article

Environmental Performance of Temporary Reusable Membrane Structures: A Life Cycle Assessment

Lincy Pyl, Carol Monticelli, Lars De Laêt, Marijke Mollaert, Zehra Eryuruk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Temporary membrane structures are widely used for short‐term events, seasonal enclosures, and reusable architectural applications. Despite their growing relevance within circular construction, their environmental performance remains insufficiently quantified, particularly when multiple installations, storage, transportation, and operational energy are considered. This paper evaluates their environmental performance through Life Cycle Assessment according to EN 15804, focusing on Global Warming Potential. Four case studies are analysed: a lightweight modular rental tent (ADD‐ON), an air‐supported tennis dome (TCI Illertissen), an easy‐to‐erect shelter (Fastival) and an ultra‐lightweight canopy (TemporActive). Results demonstrate that reuse strongly reduces Global Warming Potential per square meter per service life, while transportation and operational energy become dominant contributors as installation cycles increase. In addition, foundations and/or ballast systems increase the overall structure weight, thereby amplifying transport‐related emissions. The findings highlight the importance of designing for reuse, minimising transport distances, optimising anchorage solutions, and reducing operational energy demand.

ce/papersVol. 9(4-5)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Structural Analysis and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Environmental Performance of Temporary Reusable Membrane Structures: A Life Cycle Assessment — Lincy Pyl, Carol Monticelli, et al. · ce/papers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS