The impact of changing Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification on early functional outcomes after primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Aims We aimed to determine the impact of changing a patient’s Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotype on early functional outcomes after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA). Methods We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study of 297 patients undergoing primary RA-TKA. Standardized pre- and postoperative long-leg radiographs were obtained. Radiological measures included the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Pre- and postoperative CPAK classification was derived by determining the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and joint line obliquity (JLO). Oxford Knee Scores (OKSs) were assessed at preoperative baseline and at three months, six months, and one year postoperatively. We also investigated the isolated impact of changes in LDFA and MPTA on OKS. Results Preoperatively, the most common classification was CPAK type II (30.0%; n = 89), followed by type I (27.6%; n = 82). Postoperatively, the majority of patients were CPAK type V (30.0%; n = 89), followed by type IV and type II. Overall, 30.6% (n = 91) of patients remained in the same preoperative CPAK classification, while 62.3% (n = 185) shifted by one CPAK classification and 6.4% (n = 19) moved two phenotypes following RA-TKA. Patients who moved across two CPAK phenotypes after RA-TKA demonstrated significantly smaller improvements in OKS at three months (p = 0.008) and six months (p = 0.036) compared with those who remained in the same CPAK phenotype. Patients with LDFA changes in excess of 4° from the native value demonstrated the smallest improvement in mean three-month (7.14 (SD 9.9)) and six-month (10.95 (SD 7.0)) OKS compared with all other groups. Conclusion In this exploratory analysis, altering coronal alignment across two CPAK classifications after RA-TKA was associated with lower early functional outcomes as measured by OKS at three months and six months, though this finding was based on a small subgroup (n = 19) and warrants further investigation in larger cohorts. Furthermore, femoral coronal deviation in excess of 4° from native alignment appears to have a greater negative impact on functional outcomes than equivalent tibial changes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2026;108-B(10):1238–1246.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bone & Joint Journal
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.108b10.bjj-2025-1378.r2
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The impact of changing Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification on early functional outcomes after primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Faseeh Zaidi, Samuel J. MacDessi, Massoud Akbarshahi, Josh Petterwood et al.
The Bone & Joint Journal
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

The impact of changing Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification on early functional outcomes after primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Faseeh Zaidi, Samuel J. MacDessi, Massoud Akbarshahi, Josh Petterwood, C. Michael Goplen, Jacob T. Munro, Peter McEwen, A. Paul Monk
article en

Abstract

Aims We aimed to determine the impact of changing a patient’s Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotype on early functional outcomes after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA). Methods We conducted a retrospective multicentre cohort study of 297 patients undergoing primary RA-TKA. Standardized pre- and postoperative long-leg radiographs were obtained. Radiological measures included the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Pre- and postoperative CPAK classification was derived by determining the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and joint line obliquity (JLO). Oxford Knee Scores (OKSs) were assessed at preoperative baseline and at three months, six months, and one year postoperatively. We also investigated the isolated impact of changes in LDFA and MPTA on OKS. Results Preoperatively, the most common classification was CPAK type II (30.0%; n = 89), followed by type I (27.6%; n = 82). Postoperatively, the majority of patients were CPAK type V (30.0%; n = 89), followed by type IV and type II. Overall, 30.6% (n = 91) of patients remained in the same preoperative CPAK classification, while 62.3% (n = 185) shifted by one CPAK classification and 6.4% (n = 19) moved two phenotypes following RA-TKA. Patients who moved across two CPAK phenotypes after RA-TKA demonstrated significantly smaller improvements in OKS at three months (p = 0.008) and six months (p = 0.036) compared with those who remained in the same CPAK phenotype. Patients with LDFA changes in excess of 4° from the native value demonstrated the smallest improvement in mean three-month (7.14 (SD 9.9)) and six-month (10.95 (SD 7.0)) OKS compared with all other groups. Conclusion In this exploratory analysis, altering coronal alignment across two CPAK classifications after RA-TKA was associated with lower early functional outcomes as measured by OKS at three months and six months, though this finding was based on a small subgroup (n = 19) and warrants further investigation in larger cohorts. Furthermore, femoral coronal deviation in excess of 4° from native alignment appears to have a greater negative impact on functional outcomes than equivalent tibial changes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2026;108-B(10):1238–1246.

The Bone & Joint JournalVol. 108-B(10)
University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland City Hospital (NZ), Mater Misericordiae Hospital (AU), Zimmer Biomet (United Kingdom) (GB), Auckland District Health Board (NZ), Zimmer Biomet (United States) (US), St George Hospital (AU), Calvary Hospital (AU), Zimmer Biomet (Switzerland) (CH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.