Coupling Oxygen‐Enriched Drip Irrigation With an Optimized Nitrogen Rate Improves Yield, Water Productivity and Grain Quality of Winter Wheat: A Two‐Season Field Study

ABSTRACT Drip irrigation displaces soil air at the emitter and transiently depresses dissolved oxygen (DO) in the wetted root zone, and recovery is slow in fine‐textured, slightly saline soils. Whether aeration of the irrigation stream can be combined with nitrogen (N) management to raise water productivity while safeguarding grain quality in winter wheat remains unresolved. Over two growing seasons (2023–2024 and 2024–2025) on a slightly saline sandy loam in the southern Loess Plateau, we compared conventional water (CW; dissolved oxygen 6–8 mg L −1 ) with oxygen‐enriched water produced by a micro‐nano bubble generator (OW; dissolved oxygen 12–15 mg L −1 ) under drip fertigation at three N rates (90, 180 and 270 kg ha −1 ; N1–N3) in a randomized complete block design with three replicates, the same plots carrying the same treatments in both seasons. We measured the post‐irrigation DO supply window together with soil water content, mineral N, enzyme and microbial activity, root morphology and activity, leaf gas exchange and fluorescence, dry‐matter and N accumulation, grain yield, water productivity (WP) and grain quality, and analysed all variables in a linear mixed model with year as a repeated measure. Relative to CW, OW raised topsoil DO on day 1 after irrigation by 2.5–2.6 mg L −1 ( p < 0.001) and the elevated DO was still detectable at 7 days; mineral N was repartitioned from ‐N towards NO 3 − ‐N, with ‐N in the 0–20 cm layer at heading lower by 0.92–1.06 mg kg −1 (8%–10%) and ‐N higher by 5.8–6.9 mg kg −1 (21%–24%); and soil enzyme activity, microbial biomass, root length density, root activity and net photosynthesis all increased ( p < 0.001). Grain yield rose by 1305–1314 kg ha −1 (18.4%–19.3%) and water productivity by 2.23–2.37 kg ha −1 mm −1 . Evapotranspiration averaged 578 mm and did not differ by water type or nitrogen rate, except for two lower means in 2024–2025. The WP gain therefore tracked yield at essentially unchanged water use. Protein and wet gluten increased under OW and increased further with N rate, while grain yield and WP peaked at N2, defining a yield–protein trade‐off that oxygenation shifted upward but did not remove. TOPSIS ranked OW‐N2 first in both seasons and under all four weighting schemes and three reduced indicator sets tested, and partial least squares path modelling described a covariance structure consistent with a soil oxygen–nitrogen–root–photosynthesis–biomass sequence. Soil and root variables, but not yield, differed more strongly between water treatments in the second season; two seasons cannot separate a cumulative effect from inter‐annual variation, and we treat this observation as provisional. For water‐ and nitrogen‐saving production, OW combined with 180 kg N ha −1 is recommended, allowing fertilizer N to be reduced by about one third relative to the high rate without a yield penalty; the high rate is justified only where a protein premium outweighs the yield and WP cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Published
2026-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70255
Primary Topic
Plant responses to water stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Coupling Oxygen‐Enriched Drip Irrigation With an Optimized Nitrogen Rate Improves Yield, Water Productivity and Grain Quality of Winter Wheat: A Two‐Season Field Study

Changkun Ma, Qi Xu, Wenda Du, Quanjiu Wang
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Plant responses to water stress
article

Coupling Oxygen‐Enriched Drip Irrigation With an Optimized Nitrogen Rate Improves Yield, Water Productivity and Grain Quality of Winter Wheat: A Two‐Season Field Study

Changkun Ma, Qi Xu, Wenda Du, Quanjiu Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drip irrigation displaces soil air at the emitter and transiently depresses dissolved oxygen (DO) in the wetted root zone, and recovery is slow in fine‐textured, slightly saline soils. Whether aeration of the irrigation stream can be combined with nitrogen (N) management to raise water productivity while safeguarding grain quality in winter wheat remains unresolved. Over two growing seasons (2023–2024 and 2024–2025) on a slightly saline sandy loam in the southern Loess Plateau, we compared conventional water (CW; dissolved oxygen 6–8 mg L −1 ) with oxygen‐enriched water produced by a micro‐nano bubble generator (OW; dissolved oxygen 12–15 mg L −1 ) under drip fertigation at three N rates (90, 180 and 270 kg ha −1 ; N1–N3) in a randomized complete block design with three replicates, the same plots carrying the same treatments in both seasons. We measured the post‐irrigation DO supply window together with soil water content, mineral N, enzyme and microbial activity, root morphology and activity, leaf gas exchange and fluorescence, dry‐matter and N accumulation, grain yield, water productivity (WP) and grain quality, and analysed all variables in a linear mixed model with year as a repeated measure. Relative to CW, OW raised topsoil DO on day 1 after irrigation by 2.5–2.6 mg L −1 ( p < 0.001) and the elevated DO was still detectable at 7 days; mineral N was repartitioned from ‐N towards NO 3 − ‐N, with ‐N in the 0–20 cm layer at heading lower by 0.92–1.06 mg kg −1 (8%–10%) and ‐N higher by 5.8–6.9 mg kg −1 (21%–24%); and soil enzyme activity, microbial biomass, root length density, root activity and net photosynthesis all increased ( p < 0.001). Grain yield rose by 1305–1314 kg ha −1 (18.4%–19.3%) and water productivity by 2.23–2.37 kg ha −1 mm −1 . Evapotranspiration averaged 578 mm and did not differ by water type or nitrogen rate, except for two lower means in 2024–2025. The WP gain therefore tracked yield at essentially unchanged water use. Protein and wet gluten increased under OW and increased further with N rate, while grain yield and WP peaked at N2, defining a yield–protein trade‐off that oxygenation shifted upward but did not remove. TOPSIS ranked OW‐N2 first in both seasons and under all four weighting schemes and three reduced indicator sets tested, and partial least squares path modelling described a covariance structure consistent with a soil oxygen–nitrogen–root–photosynthesis–biomass sequence. Soil and root variables, but not yield, differed more strongly between water treatments in the second season; two seasons cannot separate a cumulative effect from inter‐annual variation, and we treat this observation as provisional. For water‐ and nitrogen‐saving production, OW combined with 180 kg N ha −1 is recommended, allowing fertilizer N to be reduced by about one third relative to the high rate without a yield penalty; the high rate is justified only where a protein premium outweighs the yield and WP cost.

Journal of Agronomy and Crop ScienceVol. 212(6)
Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Plant responses to water stress
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.