PSC Paper 3 Revision 10: Fitting a Logarithmic Redshift–Distance Law to Pantheon+SH0ES; Full-Covariance Results and Limits

An earlier version of this paper reported χ2 ν = 0.439 for a Phase-Shift Cosmology (PSC) distance-modulus model on Pantheon+SH0ES and presented it as an empirical verification that beat ΛCDM. Those claims are withdrawn. The 0.439 used diagonal errors only; with the full STAT+SYS covariance, the PSC model with one extra scale term gives χ2 = 1753.4 (χ2/dof =1.032), statistically identical to flat ΛCDM (1752.5, 1.031). PSC ties; it does not win. The tie survives the standard z > 0.01 cut for this form (∆χ2 = +0.3) but not for the exponent-free variant (+8.4). The one-parameter PSC form without the extra term is worse than ΛCDM by ∆χ2 ≈ 72 and worse than the empty-universe (Milne) model by ≈ 47. The quoted κΨ0 =1.1215×10−4 Mpc−1 was not determined by the fit: it is exactly degenerate with the magnitude offset. The physical value is κΨ0 = H0/c ≈ 2.44 × 10−4 Mpc−1. The extra scale term has no derivation and appears to compensate for a dimming factor the earlier model lacked. Supernova magnitudes at this precision do not discriminate PSC from ΛCDM or from generic two-parameter smooth curves.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23070895
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

PSC Paper 3 Revision 10: Fitting a Logarithmic Redshift–Distance Law to Pantheon+SH0ES; Full-Covariance Results and Limits

Ken E. Swearingen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
preprint

PSC Paper 3 Revision 10: Fitting a Logarithmic Redshift–Distance Law to Pantheon+SH0ES; Full-Covariance Results and Limits

Ken E. Swearingen
preprint en

Abstract

An earlier version of this paper reported χ2 ν = 0.439 for a Phase-Shift Cosmology (PSC) distance-modulus model on Pantheon+SH0ES and presented it as an empirical verification that beat ΛCDM. Those claims are withdrawn. The 0.439 used diagonal errors only; with the full STAT+SYS covariance, the PSC model with one extra scale term gives χ2 = 1753.4 (χ2/dof =1.032), statistically identical to flat ΛCDM (1752.5, 1.031). PSC ties; it does not win. The tie survives the standard z > 0.01 cut for this form (∆χ2 = +0.3) but not for the exponent-free variant (+8.4). The one-parameter PSC form without the extra term is worse than ΛCDM by ∆χ2 ≈ 72 and worse than the empty-universe (Milne) model by ≈ 47. The quoted κΨ0 =1.1215×10−4 Mpc−1 was not determined by the fit: it is exactly degenerate with the magnitude offset. The physical value is κΨ0 = H0/c ≈ 2.44 × 10−4 Mpc−1. The extra scale term has no derivation and appears to compensate for a dimming factor the earlier model lacked. Supernova magnitudes at this precision do not discriminate PSC from ΛCDM or from generic two-parameter smooth curves.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.