AOI-based gaze allocation of professional bus drivers during naturalistic docking in conventional and low-floor buses

Abstract Interactions between buses and vulnerable road users are safety-relevant in urban traffic because buses operate near curbside activity, passengers, pedestrians, motorcycles, and blind-spot regions during low-speed maneuvers. This study examined AOI-based visual inspection among professional bus drivers operating conventional and low-floor buses under naturalistic urban driving conditions. A questionnaire survey of professional drivers ( N = 215) provided descriptive contextual information on exterior indirect-vision devices and scenario-specific mirror-use needs. The primary empirical component was an on-road eye-tracking experiment involving 24 professional drivers (12 per bus-type group), each of whom completed one route run containing eight consecutive bus-stop events. Six object-based areas of interest (AOIs) were evaluated during bus-stop approach and docking. Fixation count was analyzed using an event-level negative-binomial generalized linear mixed model with Driver as a random intercept and Stop ID as a fixed control term. Fixation allocation differed substantially among AOIs, and the Bus Type × AOI interaction was significant. However, no individual AOI contrast remained significant after Holm adjustment. The findings therefore indicate a difference in the overall fixation-allocation profile between the conventional- and low-floor-bus driver groups, without confirming a difference at any single AOI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-73970-1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AOI-based gaze allocation of professional bus drivers during naturalistic docking in conventional and low-floor buses

Ting-An Kuo, Po-Hsiang Liu, Chiuhsiang Joe Lin
Scientific Reports
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

AOI-based gaze allocation of professional bus drivers during naturalistic docking in conventional and low-floor buses

Ting-An Kuo, Po-Hsiang Liu, Chiuhsiang Joe Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Interactions between buses and vulnerable road users are safety-relevant in urban traffic because buses operate near curbside activity, passengers, pedestrians, motorcycles, and blind-spot regions during low-speed maneuvers. This study examined AOI-based visual inspection among professional bus drivers operating conventional and low-floor buses under naturalistic urban driving conditions. A questionnaire survey of professional drivers ( N = 215) provided descriptive contextual information on exterior indirect-vision devices and scenario-specific mirror-use needs. The primary empirical component was an on-road eye-tracking experiment involving 24 professional drivers (12 per bus-type group), each of whom completed one route run containing eight consecutive bus-stop events. Six object-based areas of interest (AOIs) were evaluated during bus-stop approach and docking. Fixation count was analyzed using an event-level negative-binomial generalized linear mixed model with Driver as a random intercept and Stop ID as a fixed control term. Fixation allocation differed substantially among AOIs, and the Bus Type × AOI interaction was significant. However, no individual AOI contrast remained significant after Holm adjustment. The findings therefore indicate a difference in the overall fixation-allocation profile between the conventional- and low-floor-bus driver groups, without confirming a difference at any single AOI.

Scientific Reports
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW), St. John's University (TW)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.