Comparison of Position-Specific Internal and External Training Loads Within the Microcycle in Professional Football Players

This study aimed to examine position-specific differences in internal and external training load across microcycle training days in professional soccer players. Twenty-two players (4 full-backs (FB), 4 central defenders (CD), 6 central midfielders (CM), 4 wide midfielders (WM), and 4 forwards (FO)) were monitored over a 28-week competitive period using a 10-Hz GNSS-based Polar Team Pro system. Training days within the microcycle were classified relative to match day (MD) as MD-4, MD-3, and MD-2. Internal load variables were assessed using heart rate-based parameters, including average heart rate (HRavg), percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax), time spent in heart rate zones (Zones 1–5), and TRIMP. External load variables included total distance (TD), low-speed running (LSR), moderate-speed running (MSR), high-speed running (HSR), sprint running (SPR), maximum speed (Vmax), accelerations (ACC), and decelerations (DEC). One-way ANOVA revealed no significant positional differences in internal load variables. However, significant positional differences were observed in HSR, SPR, Vmax, ACC, and DEC (p < 0.05). FB, WM, and FO showed higher values in high-intensity activities than CD and CM. Additionally, FB recorded the highest external load values (except LSR), particularly on MD-3. In conclusion, while internal load variables reflect overall physiological stress, external load variables better reveal position-specific demands, particularly during high-intensity activities. Therefore, coaches should consider both internal and external load variables when planning training, particularly position-specific high-intensity demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Sport Education and Sciences
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62425/rses.2000496
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparison of Position-Specific Internal and External Training Loads Within the Microcycle in Professional Football Players

Cenab TÜRKERİ, İsmail Çiçek, Barış Gürol
Research in Sport Education and Sciences
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison of Position-Specific Internal and External Training Loads Within the Microcycle in Professional Football Players

Cenab TÜRKERİ, İsmail Çiçek, Barış Gürol
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to examine position-specific differences in internal and external training load across microcycle training days in professional soccer players. Twenty-two players (4 full-backs (FB), 4 central defenders (CD), 6 central midfielders (CM), 4 wide midfielders (WM), and 4 forwards (FO)) were monitored over a 28-week competitive period using a 10-Hz GNSS-based Polar Team Pro system. Training days within the microcycle were classified relative to match day (MD) as MD-4, MD-3, and MD-2. Internal load variables were assessed using heart rate-based parameters, including average heart rate (HRavg), percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax), time spent in heart rate zones (Zones 1–5), and TRIMP. External load variables included total distance (TD), low-speed running (LSR), moderate-speed running (MSR), high-speed running (HSR), sprint running (SPR), maximum speed (Vmax), accelerations (ACC), and decelerations (DEC). One-way ANOVA revealed no significant positional differences in internal load variables. However, significant positional differences were observed in HSR, SPR, Vmax, ACC, and DEC (p < 0.05). FB, WM, and FO showed higher values in high-intensity activities than CD and CM. Additionally, FB recorded the highest external load values (except LSR), particularly on MD-3. In conclusion, while internal load variables reflect overall physiological stress, external load variables better reveal position-specific demands, particularly during high-intensity activities. Therefore, coaches should consider both internal and external load variables when planning training, particularly position-specific high-intensity demands.

Research in Sport Education and SciencesVol. 28(3)
Eskisehir Technical University (TR), Cukurova University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.