Who’s engaging in political discussions on social media? Comparing the effects of self-monitoring and moral certainty

This study explores the role certain personality traits, specifically self-monitoring and moral certainty, play in one’s propensity to post about politics online, including engaging in potentially contentious exchanges. Using data from the ANES 2020 Exploratory Testing Survey, I examine the effects of self-monitoring and moral certainty on posting political comments online and using social media to shame another user for posting something offensive. Results show that high self-monitoring scores are correlated with increased probability of both posting political comments and calling out another user. However, moral certainty scores only produce significant results in the case of shaming someone on social media for offensive comments. These results suggest the following: 1) high self-monitors engage in both types of behaviors on social media to reflect positively on other users who share their views, (2) those high in moral certainty are driven to post on social media to address a perceived moral offense.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08835-z
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who’s engaging in political discussions on social media? Comparing the effects of self-monitoring and moral certainty

Samantha Register
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Who’s engaging in political discussions on social media? Comparing the effects of self-monitoring and moral certainty

Samantha Register
article en

Abstract

This study explores the role certain personality traits, specifically self-monitoring and moral certainty, play in one’s propensity to post about politics online, including engaging in potentially contentious exchanges. Using data from the ANES 2020 Exploratory Testing Survey, I examine the effects of self-monitoring and moral certainty on posting political comments online and using social media to shame another user for posting something offensive. Results show that high self-monitoring scores are correlated with increased probability of both posting political comments and calling out another user. However, moral certainty scores only produce significant results in the case of shaming someone on social media for offensive comments. These results suggest the following: 1) high self-monitors engage in both types of behaviors on social media to reflect positively on other users who share their views, (2) those high in moral certainty are driven to post on social media to address a perceived moral offense.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
University of Colorado Boulder (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who’s engaging in political discussions on social media? Comparing the effects of self-monitoring and moral certainty — Samantha Register · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS